Literature DB >> 16812691

Psychological distance to reward: Segmentation of aperiodic schedules of reinforcement.

J P Leung.   

Abstract

College students responded for monetary rewards in two experiments on choice between differentially segmented aperiodic schedules of reinforcement. On a microcomputer, the concurrent chains were simulated as an air-defense video game in which subjects used two radars for detecting and destroying enemy aircraft. To earn more cash-exchangeable points, subjects had to shoot down as many planes as possible within a given period of time. For both experiments, access to one of two radar systems (terminal link) was controlled by a pair of independent concurrent variable-interval 60-s schedules (initial link) with a 4-s changeover delay always in effect. In Experiment 1, the appearance of an enemy aircraft in the terminal link was determined by a variable-interval (15 s or 60 s) schedule or a two-component chained variable-interval schedule of equal duration. Experiment 2 was similar to Experiment 1 except for the segmented schedule, which had three components. Subjects preferred the unsegmented schedule over its segmented counterpart in the conditions with variable-interval 60 s, and preference tended to be more pronounced with more components in the segmented schedule. These findings are compatible with those from previous studies of periodic and aperiodic schedules with pigeons or humans as subjects.

Entities:  

Year:  1993        PMID: 16812691      PMCID: PMC1322051          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1993.59-401

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  12 in total

1.  Relative and absolute strength of response as a function of frequency of reinforcement.

Authors:  R J HERRNSTEIN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Choice between two-component chained and tandem schedules.

Authors:  J W Schneider
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-07       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Preference for unsegmented interreinforcement intervals in concurrent chains.

Authors:  J P Leung; A S Winton
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  The psychological distance to reward.

Authors:  B Duncan; E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-07       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Choice for periodic schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  B Duncan; E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-07       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Preference for simple interval schedules of reinforcement in concurrent chains: Effects of segmentation ratio.

Authors:  J P Leung; A S Winton
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1988-01       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Preference for fixed-interval schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  P Killeen
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-09       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Preference for less segmented fixed-time components in concurrent-chain schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  J P Leung; A S Winton
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Psychological distance to reward: A human replication.

Authors:  J P Leung
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  On the measurement of reinforcement frequency in the study of preference.

Authors:  P Killeen
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-05       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  1 in total

1.  Applied implications of current JEAB research on derived relations and delayed reinforcement.

Authors:  S C Hayes; L J Hayes
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1993
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.