Literature DB >> 16812499

Response-reinforcer relations and the maintenance of behavior.

S Gleeson, K A Lattal.   

Abstract

The effects on pigeons' key pecking of unsignaled delays of reinforcement and response-independent reinforcement were compared after either variable-interval or differential-reinforcement-of-low-rate baseline schedules. One 30-min session arranging delayed reinforcement and one 30-min session arranging response-independent reinforcement were conducted daily, 6 hr apart. A within-subject yoked-control procedure equated reinforcer frequency and distribution across the two sessions. Response rates usually were reduced more by response-independent than by delayed but response-contingent delivery of reinforcers. Under both schedules, response rates were lower when obtained delays were greater. These results bear upon methodological and conceptual issues regarding comparisons of contingencies that change the temporal response-reinforcer relations.

Year:  1987        PMID: 16812499      PMCID: PMC1338761          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1987.48-383

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  8 in total

Review 1.  SYSTEMATIC EFFECT OF RANDOM ERROR IN THE YOKED CONTROL DESIGN.

Authors:  R M CHURCH
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1964-08       Impact factor: 17.737

2.  Free-operant behavior under conditions of delayed reinforcement. I. CRF-type schedules.

Authors:  P B DEWS
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1960-07       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  The effect of contingency upon the appetitive conditioning of free-operant behavior.

Authors:  L J Hammond
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1980-11       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Dependency, temporal contiguity, and response-independent reinforcement.

Authors:  O J Sizemore; K A Lattal
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  The effects of unsignalled delayed reinforcement.

Authors:  B A Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-11       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Reinforcement of behavioral patterns: shaping a scallop.

Authors:  L Hawkes; C P Shimp
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1975-01       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Unsignalled delay of reinforcement in variable-interval schedules.

Authors:  O J Sizemore; K A Lattal
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-09       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  The correlation-based law of effect.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-07       Impact factor: 2.468

  8 in total
  12 in total

1.  Dynamics of the reorganization of an operant food-procuring response during an increase in the delay of reinforcement in monkeys.

Authors:  A I Erofeev; G S Belyaeva
Journal:  Neurosci Behav Physiol       Date:  2003-06

2.  Contingency and behavior analysis.

Authors:  K A Lattal
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  1995

3.  Differing views of contingencies: How contiguous?

Authors:  K A Lattal; T A Shahan
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  1997

Review 4.  Delayed reinforcement of operant behavior.

Authors:  Kennon A Lattal
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Acquisition of lever-press responding in rats with delayed reinforcement: A comparison of three procedures.

Authors:  J Wilkenfield; M Nickel; E Blakely; A Poling
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Disruption of responding maintained by conditioned reinforcement: alterations in response-conditioned-reinforcer relations.

Authors:  Gregory A Lieving; Mark P Reilly; Kennon A Lattal
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Effects of delayed reinforcement on infant vocalization rate.

Authors:  L Reeve; K F Reeve; A K Brown; J L Brown; C L Poulson
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Contingency tracking during unsignaled delayed reinforcement.

Authors:  Josue Keely; Tyler Feola; Kennon A Lattal
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Alternative reinforcer response cost impacts cocaine choice in humans.

Authors:  William W Stoops; Joshua A Lile; Paul E A Glaser; Lon R Hays; Craig R Rush
Journal:  Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2011-10-12       Impact factor: 5.067

10.  Response acquisition by Siamese fighting fish (Betta splendens) with delayed visual reinforcement.

Authors:  K A Lattal; B Metzger
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.