Literature DB >> 16812092

Visual dominance in the pigeon.

A Randich, R M Klein, V M Lolordo.   

Abstract

In Experiment 1, three pigeons were trained to obtain grain by depressing one foot treadle in the presence of a 746-Hertz tone stimulus and by depressing a second foot treadle in the presence of a red light stimulus. Intertrial stimuli included white light and the absence of tone. The latencies to respond on auditory element trials were as fast, or faster, than on visual element trials, but pigeons always responded on the visual treadle when presented with a compound stimulus composed of the auditory and visual elements. In Experiment 2, pigeons were trained on the auditory-visual discrimination task using as trial stimuli increases in the intensity of auditory or visual intertrial stimuli. Again, pigeons showed visual dominance on subsequent compound stimulus test trials. In Experiment 3, on compound test trials, the onset of the visual stimulus was delayed relative to the onset of the auditory stimulus. Visual treadle responses generally occurred with delay intervals of less than 500 milliseconds, and auditory treadle responses generally occurred with delay intervals of greater than 500 milliseconds. The results are discussed in terms of Posner, Nissen, and Klein's (1976) theory of visual dominance in humans.

Entities:  

Year:  1978        PMID: 16812092      PMCID: PMC1332708          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1978.30-129

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  5 in total

1.  Compounding of discriminative stimuli that maintain responding on separate response levers.

Authors:  L Miller
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  The effect of reinforcement differences on choice and response distribution during stimulus compounding.

Authors:  M C Bushnell; S J Weiss
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Attention to visual and kinesthetic components of skills.

Authors:  R M Klein; M I Posner
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1974-05-17       Impact factor: 3.252

4.  Attention in the pigeon: differential effects of food-getting versus shock-avoidance procedures.

Authors:  D D Foree; V M LoLordo
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1973-12

Review 5.  Visual dominance: an information-processing account of its origins and significance.

Authors:  M I Posner; M J Nissen; R M Klein
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 8.934

  5 in total
  6 in total

1.  Shared premises, different conclusions.

Authors:  D C Palmer; J W Donahoe
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  1991

2.  Effects of arousal on human visual dominance.

Authors:  K L Shapiro; B Egerman; R M Klein
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1984-06

3.  Seeing the light: exploring the Colavita visual dominance effect.

Authors:  Camille Koppen; Charles Spence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-02-27       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Sensory dominance in combinations of audio, visual and haptic stimuli.

Authors:  David Hecht; Miriam Reiner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-11-05       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Numerical averaging in mice.

Authors:  Ezgi Gür; Yalçın Akın Duyan; Fuat Balcı
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2020-11-04       Impact factor: 3.084

6.  When vision 'extinguishes' touch in neurologically-normal people: extending the Colavita visual dominance effect.

Authors:  Jess Hartcher-O'Brien; Alberto Gallace; Benedikt Krings; Camille Koppen; Charles Spence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-02-27       Impact factor: 1.972

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.