Literature DB >> 16811903

Stimulus control of differential-reinforcement-of-low-rate responding.

V A Gray.   

Abstract

Five pigeons were given single-stimulus training on an 8-sec differential-reinforcement-of-low-rate schedule followed by steady-state generalization training using 12 wavelength stimuli. Three birds had a high percentage of reinforced responses on the training schedule and flat generalization gradients of total responses. The birds with fewer reinforced responses had much steeper generalization gradients. Generalization gradients plotted as a function of both stimulus wavelength and interresponse time showed that for most birds, stimulus control was restricted to responses with long interresponse times. Responses with very short interresponse times were not under stimulus control and there was some evidence of inhibitory control of short interresponse times. Interresponse-times-per-opportunity functions, plotted as a function of stimulus wavelength, showed that stimulus wavelength controlled the temporal distribution of responses, rather than the overall rate of response. The data indicate that the differential-reinforcement-of-low-rate schedule generates several response categories that are controlled in different ways by wavelength and time-correlated stimuli, and that averaging responses regardless of interresponse-time length obscures this control.

Year:  1976        PMID: 16811903      PMCID: PMC1333451          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1976.25-199

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  11 in total

1.  EFFECTS OF AVERAGING DATA DURING STIMULUS GENERALIZATION.

Authors:  B MIGLER
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1964-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  PREDICTION OF DISCRIMINATION FROM GENERALIZATION AFTER VARIATIONS IN SCHEDULE OF REINFORCEMENT.

Authors:  A HABER; H I KALISH
Journal:  Science       Date:  1963-10-18       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  The dependence of interresponse times upon the relative reinforcement of different interresponse times.

Authors:  D ANGER
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1956-09

4.  Collateral responding during differential reinforcement of low rates.

Authors:  G E Zuriff
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-11       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Discrete-trials spaced responding in the pigeon: the dependence of efficient performance on the availability of a stimulus for collateral pecking.

Authors:  B Schwartz; D R Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1971-09       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Analysis of response rates during stimulus generalization.

Authors:  B Migler; J R Millenson
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-01       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Repeated measurements of reinforcement effects on gradients of stimulus control.

Authors:  M D Zeiler
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-05       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Inhibition and the stimulus control of operant behavior.

Authors:  E Hearst; S Besley; G W Farthing
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-11       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  The distribution of interresponse times in the pigeon during variable-interval reinforcement.

Authors:  P M Blough; D S Blough
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-01       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Further observations on overt "mediating" behavior and the discrimination of time.

Authors:  V G Laties; B Weiss; A B Weiss
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-01       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  8 in total

1.  Memory for recent behavior in the pigeon.

Authors:  S P Kramer
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  The legacy of Guttman and Kalish (1956): Twenty-five years of research on stimulus generalization.

Authors:  W K Honig; P J Urcuioli
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-11       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Inhibition: A cautionary tale.

Authors:  J W Donahoe; D C Palmer
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Conditional acceleration and external disinhibition of operant lever pressing by prereward, neutral, and reinforcing stimuli.

Authors:  N S Hemmes; H J Rubinsky
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  The quantal nature of controlling stimulus-response relations as measured in tests of stimulus generalization.

Authors:  W K Bickel; B C Etzel
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Discriminated interresponse times: role of autoshaped responses.

Authors:  D C Palmer; J W Donahoe; M A Crowley
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1985-11       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  The allocation of time to temporally defined behaviors: responding during stimulus generalization.

Authors:  M A Crowley
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Operant generalization in quail neonates after intradimensional training: Distinguishing positive and negative reinforcement.

Authors:  Susan M Schneider; Robert Lickliter
Journal:  Behav Processes       Date:  2009-08-25       Impact factor: 1.777

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.