Literature DB >> 16811865

Preference and discrimination between response-dependent and response-independent schedules of reinforcement.

R P Brinker, J T Treadway.   

Abstract

Four Asian quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica) were exposed to concurrent-chain schedules, the terminal links of which were either variable-interval 30 sec and variable-time 30 sec, or fixed-interval 30 sec and fixed-time 30 sec. Except for one bird that exhibited a preference for the variable-interval schedule over the variable-time schedule, no consistent preferences were demonstrated for response-dependent or response-independent schedules. However, response rates were three times greater on response-dependent than on response-independent schedules. The discrimination between terminal-link schedules was rapidly recovered after the schedule positions were reversed. Casual observations revealed that the birds engaged in stereotypic circling and pecking while the response-independent schedules were operative.

Entities:  

Year:  1975        PMID: 16811865      PMCID: PMC1333382          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1975.24-73

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  6 in total

1.  A progression for generating variable-interval schedules.

Authors:  M FLESHLER; H S HOFFMAN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1962-10       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  On the law of effect.

Authors:  R J Herrnstein
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Effects of rate of reinforcement-time upon concurrent operant performance.

Authors:  R L Ten Eyck
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-11       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Choice and rate of reinforcement.

Authors:  E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-09       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Superstitious key pecking after three peck-produced reinforcements.

Authors:  A J Neuringer
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Effects of required rates of responding upon choice.

Authors:  E Fantino
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-01       Impact factor: 2.468

  6 in total
  1 in total

1.  To peck or not peck: Which do pigeons prefer?

Authors:  Danielle M Andrews; Thomas R Zentall
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 1.986

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.