Literature DB >> 16811792

Transfer of control of the pigeon's key peck from food reinforcement to avoidance of shock.

D D Foree, V M Lolordo.   

Abstract

Eight pigeons were initially trained to peck a white key for food under a variable-interval 1-min schedule of reinforcement. Then, a shock-avoidance schedule was initiated and food was no longer available in the experimental situation. Under the avoidance schedule, each peck on the key postponed shock for 40 sec. A warning signal, consisting of tone and red houselights, was presented after 30 sec without a response. If no response occurred, a shock was delivered 10 sec after warning-signal onset. Shocks were delivered every 10 sec in the presence of the warning signal until a response was made. The warning signal was terminated only by a response. Key pecking of all eight pigeons came under control of the avoidance schedule and responding continued throughout the 20-day avoidance training period.

Year:  1974        PMID: 16811792      PMCID: PMC1333267          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1974.22-251

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  22 in total

1.  Inexpensive pubis electrodes for delivering shock to pigeons.

Authors:  R C Coughlin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-05       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Nondiscriminated avoidance of shock by pigeons pecking a key.

Authors:  E A Ferrari; J C Todorov; F G Graeff
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-03       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Autoshaping of key pecking in pigeons with negative reinforcement.

Authors:  H Rachlin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-07       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Signalled and unsignalled free-operant avoidance in the pigeon.

Authors:  D D Foree; V M Lolordo
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-05       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Escape and avoidance of shock by pigeons pecking a key.

Authors:  P N Hineline; H Rachlin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-07       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Incompatability between the pigeons' unconditioned response to shock and the conditioned key-peck response.

Authors:  R F Smith; C R Gustavson; G L Gregor
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-07       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  A shaping technique for producing rapid and reliable Sidman bar-press avoidance.

Authors:  D Riess
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Free-operant avoidance in the pigeon using a treadle response.

Authors:  R F Smith; F R Keller
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1970-03       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Factors affecting feather posture in the Barbary dove.

Authors:  D J McFarland; E Baher
Journal:  Anim Behav       Date:  1968-02       Impact factor: 2.844

10.  Avoidance responding in pigeons.

Authors:  E M Macphail
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-09       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  4 in total

1.  Parameters affecting the maintenance of negatively reinforced key pecking.

Authors:  E T Gardner; P Lewis
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-09       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Signalled free-operant avoidance of shock by pigeons pecking a key.

Authors:  A B De Moraes; J C Todorov
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Warmup in avoidance as a function of time since prior training.

Authors:  P N Hineline
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-01       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 4.  Responding changes systematically within sessions during conditioning procedures.

Authors:  F K McSweeney; J M Roll
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 2.468

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.