Literature DB >> 16811773

Preference for signalled reinforcement.

P Lewis, L Lewin, P Muehleisen, M Stoyak.   

Abstract

Key pecking was reinforced on a two-component multiple schedule. A variable-interval schedule controlled reinforcement in both components. During one component, access to reinforcement was preceded by a tone; in the other component, a standard unsignalled schedule was in effect. After performance stabilized, subjects were given a choice between the signalled and unsignalled schedules. They were placed in the chamber with the unsignalled schedule in effect on the right key. A single response on the left, or changeover, key produced the signalled schedule for 1 min. Both pigeons in Experiment I pecked the changeover key at a rate sufficient to remain under the signalled schedule for over 90% of the session. Removing and reintroducing the tone demonstrated that the changeover-key responses were due to the occurrence of the tone. In Experiment II, when pecking the changeover key produced the unsignalled schedule, pecking the changeover key declined. The results may be explained either in terms of Hendry's information hypothesis or as escape from an intermittent positive reinforcement schedule.

Year:  1974        PMID: 16811773      PMCID: PMC1333252          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1974.22-143

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  16 in total

1.  Time-out from positive reinforcement.

Authors:  N H AZRIN
Journal:  Science       Date:  1961-02-10       Impact factor: 47.728

2.  TECHNIQUE FOR SUSTAINING BEHAVIOR WITH CONDITIONED REINFORCEMENT.

Authors:  J ZIMMERMAN
Journal:  Science       Date:  1963-11-08       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  TOWARDS AN EMPIRICAL CALCULUS OF REINFORCEMENT VALUE.

Authors:  T VERHAVE
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1963-10       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  A progression for generating variable-interval schedules.

Authors:  M FLESHLER; H S HOFFMAN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1962-10       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  The acquisition of observing responses in the absence of differential external reinforcement.

Authors:  W F PROKASY
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1956-04

6.  The stimulus conditions which follow learned responses.

Authors:  C C PERKINS
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1955-09       Impact factor: 8.934

7.  The relative aversiveness of signalled vs unsignalled escapable and inescapable shock.

Authors:  P Badia; S Culbertson
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-05       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Rats prefer signaled reinforcing brain stimulation to unsignaled ESB.

Authors:  M B Cantor; V M LoLordo
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1970-05

9.  Chronic fear produced by unpredictable electric shock.

Authors:  M E Seligman
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1968-10

10.  Value of knowing when reinforcement is due.

Authors:  G Bower; J McLean; J Meacham
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1966-10
View more
  8 in total

1.  Time allocation in concurrent schedules: the effect of signalled reinforcement.

Authors:  H Marcucella; G Margolius
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-05       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Choosing schedules of signaled appetitive events over schedules of unsignaled ones.

Authors:  P Badia; K Ryan; J Harsh
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Preference for signaled versus unsignaled reinforcement delay in concurrent-chain schedules.

Authors:  A J Marcattilio; R W Richards
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Signal-controlled responding.

Authors:  P Lewis; M Stoyak
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1979-01       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Signal modality and choice between signaled and unsignaled food.

Authors:  J Harsh; P Badia; K Ryan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1984-09       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Preference for less segmented fixed-time components in concurrent-chain schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  J P Leung; A S Winton
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Factors affecting choice of signaled or unsignaled food schedules.

Authors:  J Harsh; P Badia; K Ryan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1983-11       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Functional analysis and treatment of destructive behavior maintained by termination of "don't" (and symmetrical "do") requests.

Authors:  W W Fisher; J D Adelinis; R H Thompson; A S Worsdell; J R Zarcone
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1998
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.