Literature DB >> 16811723

Interactions in multiple schedules with different responses in each of the components.

J Scull, R F Westbrook.   

Abstract

Pigeons were exposed to multiple schedules in which a key was lit in one component and a bar was present in the other. Ten subjects were trained to peck the key and to press the bar with their feet, and four subjects were trained to peck both the bar and the key. After a period of exposure to variable-interval reinforcement in both components, subjects were exposed to extinction in one component. Only one of the 10 pigeons in the key-peck:bar-press condition showed an increase in rate in the other component, while seven of them showed a decrease. In the key-peck:bar-peck condition, three of the four subjects showed positive contrast. The data suggest that a condition for contrast to occur is that topographically similar behaviors be required in both components of the multiple schedule.

Year:  1973        PMID: 16811723      PMCID: PMC1334176          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1973.20-511

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  3 in total

1.  A progression for generating variable-interval schedules.

Authors:  M FLESHLER; H S HOFFMAN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1962-10       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Behavioral contrast.

Authors:  G S REYNOLDS
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-01       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Failure to obtain positive contrast when pigeons press a bar.

Authors:  R F Westbrook
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1973-11       Impact factor: 2.468

  3 in total
  9 in total

1.  The effects of different component response requirements in multiple and concurrent schedules.

Authors:  M Davison; A Ferguson
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Real-time detection of orientation during negative behavioral contrast with key pecking and a turning response.

Authors:  K Manabe
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Behavioral contrast of time allocation.

Authors:  A Bouzas; W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  A comparison of the key-peck and treadle-press operants in the pigeon: differential-reinforcement-of-low-rate schedule of reinforcement.

Authors:  W K Richardson; D B Clark
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Behavioral contrast without response-rate reduction.

Authors:  M S Halliday; R A Boakes
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-11       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Behavioral contrast in rats with different reinforcers and different response topographies.

Authors:  R J Beninger; S B Kendall
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1975-11       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Choice performance in several concurrent key-peck treadle-press reinforcement schedules.

Authors:  K L Wheatley; L A Engberg
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Positive contrast, negative induction, and inhibitory stimulus control in the rat.

Authors:  A Gutman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  An investigation of peak shift and behavioral contrast for autoshaped and operant behavior.

Authors:  M C Bushnell; S J Weiss
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1980-01       Impact factor: 2.468

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.