Literature DB >> 16811508

Differential reinforcement of other behavior (DRO): a yoked-control comparison.

J Davis, M E Bitterman.   

Abstract

After training to press a lever on a variable-interval 30-sec schedule, one group of rats was shifted to a differential-reinforcement-of-other-behavior 10-sec schedule, while a second group was shifted to a noncontingent yoked-control schedule that provided the same frequency and distribution of reinforcement. Then, both groups were extensively retrained on the variable-interval schedule, after which the first group was shifted to a series of differential-reinforcement-of-other-behavior 30-sec sessions alternating daily with variable-interval 30-sec sessions, while the second group was treated like the first on variable-interval days and yoked with the first as before on differential-reinforcement-of-other-behavior days. In both phases, response-decrement was more rapid and more marked in the differential-reinforcement-of-other-behavior animals than in the controls. The difference was due, at least in large measure, to sustainment of response in the control animals by adventitious reinforcement. All the differential-reinforcement-of-other-behavior animals developed "other" behavior-the same distinctive pattern of waiting at the foodcup-but there was no direct evidence that it contributed in any way to the decrement in lever pressing.

Entities:  

Year:  1971        PMID: 16811508      PMCID: PMC1333808          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1971.15-237

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  7 in total

1.  The discrimination of contingent from noncontingent reinforcement.

Authors:  J B APPEL; R H HISS
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1962-02

2.  Behavioral contrast.

Authors:  G S REYNOLDS
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1961-01       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Differential reinforcement and stimulus control of not responding.

Authors:  J A Nevin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-11       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Some variables affecting the superstitious chaining of responses.

Authors:  J J Boren
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-11       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Collateral responding during differential reinforcement of low rates.

Authors:  G E Zuriff
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1969-11       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Fixed and variable schedules of response-independent reinforcement.

Authors:  M D Zeiler
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1968-07       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Reinforcement of competing behavior during extinction.

Authors:  H Leitenberg; R A Rawson; K Bath
Journal:  Science       Date:  1970-07-17       Impact factor: 47.728

  7 in total
  11 in total

1.  On habits and addiction: An associative analysis of compulsive drug seeking.

Authors:  Sean B Ostlund; Bernard W Balleine
Journal:  Drug Discov Today Dis Models       Date:  2008

Review 2.  A review of reinforcement control procedures.

Authors:  Rachel H Thompson; Brian A Iwata
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  2005

3.  Elimination of reinforced behavior: intermittent schedules of not-responding.

Authors:  M D Zeiler
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Signalled reinforcement in differential-reinforcement-of-low rate schedules.

Authors:  H Marcucella
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-09       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Positive reinforcement and the elimination of reinforced responses.

Authors:  M D Zeiler
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1976-07       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 6.  Reward-guided learning beyond dopamine in the nucleus accumbens: the integrative functions of cortico-basal ganglia networks.

Authors:  Henry H Yin; Sean B Ostlund; Bernard W Balleine
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2008-09-10       Impact factor: 3.386

7.  Increased expression of 5-HT₆ receptors in dorsolateral striatum decreases habitual lever pressing, but does not affect learning acquisition of simple operant tasks in rats.

Authors:  Daniel Eskenazi; John F Neumaier
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 3.386

8.  Lesion of striatal patches disrupts habitual behaviors and increases behavioral variability.

Authors:  Jacob A Nadel; Sean S Pawelko; Della Copes-Finke; Maya Neidhart; Christopher D Howard
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Genetic deletion of A2A adenosine receptors in the striatum selectively impairs habit formation.

Authors:  Chunxiu Yu; Jay Gupta; Jiang-Fan Chen; Henry H Yin
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-12-02       Impact factor: 6.167

10.  The role of the rat medial prefrontal cortex in adapting to changes in instrumental contingency.

Authors:  Etienne Coutureau; Frederic Esclassan; Georges Di Scala; Alain R Marchand
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-04       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.