Literature DB >> 16811495

Color alternation learning in the pigeon under fixed-ratio schedules of reinforcement.

B A Williams.   

Abstract

Pigeons were trained on a non-spatial delayed alternation task in which the correct stimulus was that color not responded to on the preceding trial. Subjects required to emit either 15 or 30 pecks to the correct stimulus within a trial learned the task, those required to emit only one or five pecks did not. Also, alternation was learned more easily after an incorrect than after a correct trial. Later experiments showed that a minimum fixed-ratio value was required for successful color alternation to occur, even though no fixed-ratio requirement was necessary when a position cue was available. The mechanism of the fixed-ratio effects derived from the pigeons' tendency to repeat their response in the presence of the color reinforced on the last trial. Whereas subjects trained on larger fixed-ratios corrected this error tendency within a trial, subjects trained on smaller fixed ratios did not.

Entities:  

Year:  1971        PMID: 16811495      PMCID: PMC1333794          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1971.15-129

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  6 in total

1.  Analysis of object-alternation learning in rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  I BEHAR
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1961-10

2.  Delayed alternation in the pigeon.

Authors:  E HEARST
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1962-04       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  A further experimental analysis of the behavioral deficit that follows injury to the primate frontal cortex.

Authors:  K H PRIBRAM
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  1961-05       Impact factor: 5.330

4.  Analysis of the effects of frontal lesions in monkey. III. Object alternation.

Authors:  K H PRIBRAM; M MISHKIN
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1956-02

5.  Discrete-trials lever pressing in the rat as a function of pattern of reinforcement, effortfulness of response, and amount of reward.

Authors:  R C Gonzalez; P Bainbridge; M E Bitterman
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1966-02

6.  Transfer effects of successive discrimination-reversal training in chimpanzees.

Authors:  R J SCHUSTERMAN
Journal:  Science       Date:  1962-08-10       Impact factor: 47.728

  6 in total
  11 in total

1.  The effects of interval duration on temporal tracking and alternation learning.

Authors:  Elliot A Ludvig; John E R Staddon
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Control of pigeons' pecking by trace stimuli.

Authors:  D M Wilkie; C S Wilson
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-03       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Non-spatial delayed alternation by the pigeon.

Authors:  B A Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1971-07       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Effects of fixed-ratio sample and choice response requirements upon oddity matching.

Authors:  T Lydersen; D Perkins; H Chairez
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  The conditions for temporal tracking under interval schedules of reinforcement.

Authors:  Elliot A Ludvig; John E R Staddon
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process       Date:  2004-10

6.  Examining the discriminative and strengthening effects of reinforcers in concurrent schedules.

Authors:  Nathalie Boutros; Douglas Elliffe; Michael Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Serial discrimination reversal learning in pigeons as a function of signal properties during the delay of reinforcement.

Authors:  Bertram O Ploog; Ben A Williams
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 1.986

8.  Does effort play a role in the effect of response requirements on delayed matching to sample?

Authors:  M L Spetch; D Treit
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  On the failure and facilitation of conditional discrimination.

Authors:  B A Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1982-11       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Waiting to decide helps in the face of probabilistic uncertainty but not delay uncertainty.

Authors:  Michael E Young; Steven C Sutherland; James J Cole; Nam Nguyen
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 1.986

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.