Literature DB >> 16811469

The response-shock-shock-shock interval and unsignalled avoidance in goldfish.

S R Scobie.   

Abstract

Goldfish were trained to swim back and forth in a shuttle tank to avoid unsignalled shocks. The response-shock interval and the shock-shock interval were always of equal duration; both were either 15, 30, 45, or 60 sec. Response rates varied inversely with response-shock-shock-shock interval duration, as has been found with rats. Percentage of shocks avoided was somewhat lower at the 15 sec response-shock-shock-shock interval, but otherwise did not vary systematically with changes in the interval. As the response-shock-shock-shock interval increased, the fish made increasingly more responses than necessary to avoid all shocks. Interresponse-time distributions showed that response probability rose to a maximum at about 15 to 25 sec after a response, regardless of the response-shock-shock-shock interval. Thus, at the longer intervals the fish were responding too early in the response-shock-shock-shock interval to minimize response rates.

Entities:  

Year:  1970        PMID: 16811469      PMCID: PMC1333723          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1970.14-219

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  5 in total

1.  The role of temporal discriminations in the reinforcement of Sidman avoidance behavior.

Authors:  D ANGER
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1963-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Sidman avoidance in the fish.

Authors:  E R BEHREND; M E BITTERMAN
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1963-01       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Avoidance responding as a function of simultaneous and equal changes in two temporal parameters.

Authors:  T VERHAVE
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1959-07       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Two temporal parameters of the maintenance of avoidance behavior by the white rat.

Authors:  M SIDMAN
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1953-08

5.  Free operant avoidance as a function of the response-shock = shock-shock interval.

Authors:  F C Clark; L D Hull
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1966-11       Impact factor: 2.468

  5 in total
  4 in total

1.  Unsignalled avoidance in a shuttlebox: a rapid acquisition, high-efficiency paradigm.

Authors:  D Riess; C H Farrar
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-07       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Effects of response-shock interval and shock intensity on free-operant avoidance responding in the pigeon.

Authors:  M Klein; M Rilling
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-09       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 3.  Responding changes systematically within sessions during conditioning procedures.

Authors:  F K McSweeney; J M Roll
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Avoidance conditioning in bamboo sharks (Chiloscyllium griseum and C. punctatum): behavioral and neuroanatomical aspects.

Authors:  Susanne Schwarze; Horst Bleckmann; Vera Schluessel
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.836

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.