PURPOSE: Prognostic factors for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) are well established. However, the risk profile is unknown for patients with recurrent RCC after a nephrectomy for localized disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 1989 to July 2005, we identified patients with localized RCC treated by nephrectomy who subsequently developed recurrent disease. We applied a validated prognostic scoring system previously developed for patients with metastatic RCC. Each patient was given a total risk score of 0 to 5, with one point for each of five prognostic variables (recurrence < 12 months after nephrectomy, serum calcium > 10 mg/dL, hemoglobin < lower limit of normal, lactate dehydrogenase > 1.5x upper limit of normal, and Karnofsky performance status < 80%). Patients were categorized into low- (score = 0), intermediate- (score = 1 to 2), and high-risk subgroups (score = 3 to 5). RESULTS: Our final cohort included 118 patients, with a median survival time of 21 months from the time of recurrence. Median follow-up time for survivors was 27 months. Overall survival was strongly associated with risk group category (P < .0001). Low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk criteria were fulfilled in 34%, 50%, and 16% of patients, respectively. Median survival time for low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk patients was 76, 25, and 6 months, respectively. Two-year overall survival rates for low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk patients were 88% (95% CI, 77% to 99%), 51% (95% CI, 37% to 65%), and 11% (95% CI, 0% to 24%), respectively. CONCLUSION: At disease recurrence after nephrectomy for localized disease, a scoring system based on objective clinical and laboratory data provides meaningful risk stratification for both patient counseling and clinical trial entry.
PURPOSE: Prognostic factors for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) are well established. However, the risk profile is unknown for patients with recurrent RCC after a nephrectomy for localized disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 1989 to July 2005, we identified patients with localized RCC treated by nephrectomy who subsequently developed recurrent disease. We applied a validated prognostic scoring system previously developed for patients with metastatic RCC. Each patient was given a total risk score of 0 to 5, with one point for each of five prognostic variables (recurrence < 12 months after nephrectomy, serum calcium > 10 mg/dL, hemoglobin < lower limit of normal, lactate dehydrogenase > 1.5x upper limit of normal, and Karnofsky performance status < 80%). Patients were categorized into low- (score = 0), intermediate- (score = 1 to 2), and high-risk subgroups (score = 3 to 5). RESULTS: Our final cohort included 118 patients, with a median survival time of 21 months from the time of recurrence. Median follow-up time for survivors was 27 months. Overall survival was strongly associated with risk group category (P < .0001). Low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk criteria were fulfilled in 34%, 50%, and 16% of patients, respectively. Median survival time for low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk patients was 76, 25, and 6 months, respectively. Two-year overall survival rates for low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk patients were 88% (95% CI, 77% to 99%), 51% (95% CI, 37% to 65%), and 11% (95% CI, 0% to 24%), respectively. CONCLUSION: At disease recurrence after nephrectomy for localized disease, a scoring system based on objective clinical and laboratory data provides meaningful risk stratification for both patient counseling and clinical trial entry.
Authors: Paul L Crispen; Yuri Sheinin; Timothy J Roth; Christine M Lohse; Susan M Kuntz; Xavier Frigola; R Houston Thompson; Stephen A Boorjian; Haidong Dong; Bradley C Leibovich; Michael L Blute; Eugene D Kwon Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2008-08-11 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Reza Mehrazin; Robert G Uzzo; Alexander Kutikov; Karen Ruth; Jeffrey J Tomaszewski; Essel Dulaimi; Serge Ginzburg; Philip H Abbosh; Timothy Ito; Anthony T Corcoran; David Y T Chen; Marc C Smaldone; Tahseen Al-Saleem Journal: Urol Oncol Date: 2014-07-11 Impact factor: 3.498
Authors: Arkadiusz Z Dudek; Ahmad Raza; Ming Chi; Meghali Singhal; Rajneet Oberoi; Rajendar K Mittapalli; Sagar Agarwal; William F Elmquist Journal: Clin Genitourin Cancer Date: 2012-12-21 Impact factor: 2.872
Authors: Michael A Feuerstein; John E Musser; Matthew Kent; Michael Chevinsky; Eugene K Cha; Simon Kimm; William M Hilton; Daniel D Sjoberg; Timothy F Donahue; Hebert A Vargas; Jonathan A Coleman; Paul Russo Journal: World J Urol Date: 2015-10-28 Impact factor: 4.226
Authors: D Clay Cochran; Michael D Chan; Mebea Aklilu; James F Lovato; Natalie K Alphonse; J Daniel Bourland; James J Urbanic; Kevin P McMullen; Edward G Shaw; Stephen B Tatter; Thomas L Ellis Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2012-03-02 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: Ricardo A Rendon; Anil Kapoor; Rodney Breau; Michael Leveridge; Andrew Feifer; Peter C Black; Alan So Journal: Can Urol Assoc J Date: 2014-05 Impact factor: 1.862
Authors: Vitaly Margulis; Surena F Matin; Nizar Tannir; Pheroze Tamboli; Yu Shen; Marisa Lozano; David A Swanson; Eric Jonasch; Christopher G Wood Journal: Urology Date: 2008-10-31 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: Michael E Karellas; Thomas L Jang; Megan A Kagiwada; Michael D Kinnaman; William R Jarnagin; Paul Russo Journal: BJU Int Date: 2008-09-08 Impact factor: 5.588