Literature DB >> 16809569

A sham-controlled trial of a 5-day course of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the unaffected hemisphere in stroke patients.

Felipe Fregni1, Paulo S Boggio, Angela C Valle, Renata R Rocha, Julia Duarte, Merari J L Ferreira, Tim Wagner, Shirley Fecteau, Sergio P Rigonatti, Marcelo Riberto, Steven D Freedman, Alvaro Pascual-Leone.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: It has been recently shown that a single session of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the unaffected hemisphere can improve motor function in stroke patients; however, this improvement is short-lasting. We therefore conducted a randomized, sham-controlled, phase II trial to evaluate whether five sessions of low-frequency rTMS can increase the magnitude and duration of these effects and whether this approach is safe.
METHODS: Fifteen patients with chronic stroke were randomized to receive active or sham rTMS of the unaffected hemisphere. A blinded rater assessed motor function and corticospinal excitability at baseline, during and after 2 weeks of treatment. Safety was assessed using a neuropsychologic battery and electroencephalogram.
RESULTS: Active rTMS resulted in a significant improvement of the motor function performance in the affected hand that lasted for 2 weeks. These effects were not observed in the sham rTMS group (affected and unaffected hand) and in the unaffected hand in the active rTMS group. Corticospinal excitability decreased in the stimulated, unaffected hemisphere and increased in the affected hemisphere. There was a significant correlation between motor function improvement and corticospinal excitability change in the affected hemisphere. Cognitive performance and electroencephalogram were not changed significantly throughout the trial in both groups of treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: These results support and extend the findings of previous studies on rTMS in stroke patients because five consecutive sessions of rTMS increased the magnitude and duration of the motor effects. Furthermore, this increased dose of rTMS is not associated with cognitive adverse effects and/or epileptogenic activity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16809569     DOI: 10.1161/01.STR.0000231390.58967.6b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stroke        ISSN: 0039-2499            Impact factor:   7.914


  134 in total

Review 1.  Research with rTMS in the treatment of aphasia.

Authors:  Margaret A Naeser; Paula I Martin; Ethan Treglia; Michael Ho; Elina Kaplan; Shahid Bashir; Roy Hamilton; H Branch Coslett; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.406

Review 2.  Assessment and modulation of neural plasticity in rehabilitation with transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Shahid Bashir; Ilan Mizrahi; Kayleen Weaver; Felipe Fregni; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  PM R       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.298

Review 3.  Brain Stimulation and the Role of the Right Hemisphere in Aphasia Recovery.

Authors:  Peter E Turkeltaub
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 5.081

Review 4.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation for the prediction and enhancement of rehabilitation treatment effects.

Authors:  Michelle Harris-Love
Journal:  J Neurol Phys Ther       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 3.649

5.  Inhibition versus facilitation of contralesional motor cortices in stroke: Deriving a model to tailor brain stimulation.

Authors:  Vishwanath Sankarasubramanian; Andre G Machado; Adriana B Conforto; Kelsey A Potter-Baker; David A Cunningham; Nicole M Varnerin; Xiaofeng Wang; Ken Sakaie; Ela B Plow
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-03-21       Impact factor: 3.708

6.  Neural substrates of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation during movement in healthy subjects and acute stroke patients. A PET study.

Authors:  Fabrice Conchou; Isabelle Loubinoux; Evelyne Castel-Lacanal; Anne Le Tinnier; Angélique Gerdelat-Mas; Nathalie Faure-Marie; Helene Gros; Claire Thalamas; Fabienne Calvas; Isabelle Berry; François Chollet; Marion Simonetta Moreau
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 7.  Priming the brain to capitalize on metaplasticity in stroke rehabilitation.

Authors:  Jessica M Cassidy; Bernadette T Gillick; James R Carey
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2013-08-15

8.  Effects of Low-Frequency Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Swallowing Function and Quality of Life of Post-stroke Patients.

Authors:  Nezehat Özgül Ünlüer; Çağrı Mesut Temuçin; Numan Demir; Selen Serel Arslan; Aynur Ayşe Karaduman
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 3.438

Review 9.  Neuromodulation for brain disorders: challenges and opportunities.

Authors:  Matthew D Johnson; Hubert H Lim; Theoden I Netoff; Allison T Connolly; Nessa Johnson; Abhrajeet Roy; Abbey Holt; Kelvin O Lim; James R Carey; Jerrold L Vitek; Bin He
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 4.538

10.  Poststroke dysphagia rehabilitation by repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation: a noncontrolled pilot study.

Authors:  E Verin; A M Leroi
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2008-10-28       Impact factor: 3.438

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.