Literature DB >> 16808607

A dose threshold for a medium transfer bystander effect for a human skin cell line.

Zhengfeng Liu1, Carmel E Mothersill, Fiona E McNeill, Fiona M Lyng, Soo Hyun Byun, Colin B Seymour, William V Prestwich.   

Abstract

The existence of radiation-induced bystander effects mediated by diffusible factors is now accepted, but the mechanisms and precise behavior at low doses remain unclear. We exposed cells to gamma-ray doses in the range 0.04 mGy-5 Gy, harvested the culture medium, and transferred it to unirradiated reporter cells. Calcium fluxes and clonogenic survival were measured in the recipients. We show evidence for a dose threshold around 2 mGy for the human skin cell line used with a suggestion of increased survival below that dose. Similar experiments using direct gamma irradiation showed no reduction in survival until the dose exceeded 7 mGy. Preliminary data for neutrons where the gamma-ray dose was kept below the bystander threshold do not show a significant bystander effect in the dose range 1-33 mGy. A lack of a bystander response with neutrons occurred at around 1 Gy, where significant cell killing from direct irradiation was observed. The result may have implications for understanding the role of bystander effects at low doses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16808607     DOI: 10.1667/RR3580.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiat Res        ISSN: 0033-7587            Impact factor:   2.841


  24 in total

1.  A role for bioelectric effects in the induction of bystander signals by ionizing radiation?

Authors:  C Mothersill; G Moran; F McNeill; M D Gow; J Denbeigh; W Prestwich; C B Seymour
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2007-04-03       Impact factor: 2.658

2.  Alternative medicine techniques have non-linear effects on radiation response and can alter the expression of radiation induced bystander effects.

Authors:  Carmel Mothersill; Richard Smith; Matthew Henry; Colin Seymour; Raimond Wong
Journal:  Dose Response       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 2.658

3.  Radiation-induced bystander effects in the Atlantic salmon (salmo salar L.) following mixed exposure to copper and aluminum combined with low-dose gamma radiation.

Authors:  Carmel Mothersill; Richard W Smith; Lene Sørlie Heier; Hans-Christian Teien; Ole Christian Lind; Ole Christian Land; Colin B Seymour; Deborah Oughton; Brit Salbu
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 1.925

4.  Bystander effect in tumor cells produced by Iodine-125 labeled human lymphocytes.

Authors:  Omar Mamlouk; Pichumani Balagurumoorthy; Ketai Wang; S James Adelstein; Amin I Kassis
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2012-07-09       Impact factor: 2.694

Review 5.  Targeted and Off-Target (Bystander and Abscopal) Effects of Radiation Therapy: Redox Mechanisms and Risk/Benefit Analysis.

Authors:  Jean-Pierre Pouget; Alexandros G Georgakilas; Jean-Luc Ravanat
Journal:  Antioxid Redox Signal       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 8.401

6.  Radiation induced bystander effects in the spleen of cranially-irradiated rats.

Authors:  Amal A Mohye El-Din; Abdelrazek B Abdelrazzak; Moustafa T Ahmed; Mohamed A El-Missiry
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-09-20       Impact factor: 3.039

7.  Emerging role of radiation induced bystander effects: Cell communications and carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Rajamanickam Baskar
Journal:  Genome Integr       Date:  2010-09-12

8.  Uncomfortable issues in radiation protection posed by low-dose radiobiology.

Authors:  Carmel Mothersill; Colin Seymour
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 1.925

9.  Irradiated human endothelial progenitor cells induce bystander killing in human non-small cell lung and pancreatic cancer cells.

Authors:  William T Turchan; Ronald H Shapiro; Garrett V Sevigny; Helen Chin-Sinex; Benjamin Pruden; Marc S Mendonca
Journal:  Int J Radiat Biol       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 2.694

10.  Radiation induced bystander signals are independent of DNA damage and DNA repair capacity of the irradiated cells.

Authors:  Genro Kashino; Keiji Suzuki; Naoki Matsuda; Seiji Kodama; Koji Ono; Masami Watanabe; Kevin M Prise
Journal:  Mutat Res       Date:  2007-02-28       Impact factor: 2.433

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.