Literature DB >> 16808424

The deep play of medicine: discursive and collaborative processing of evidence in medical problem solving.

Per Måseide1.   

Abstract

Ethnographic research was conducted in the thoracic ward of a Norwegian university hospital in order to study collaborative medical problem solving. As a general principle, evidence-based medicine is supposed to lead the process of medical problem solving. However, medical problem solving also requires evidence of a different kind. This is the more concrete form of evidence, such as X rays and other representations, that guides medical practice and makes sure that decisions are grounded in sound empirical facts and knowledge. In medicine, 'evidence' is on the one hand an abstract category; on the other hand, it is a tool that is practically enacted during the problem-solving work. Medical evidence does not 'show itself'. As such it has an emergent quality. Medical evidence has to be established and made practically useful in the collaborative settings by the participants in order to make conclusions about diagnoses and treatment. Hence, evidence is an interactional product; it is discursively generated and its applicability requires discourse. In addition, the production of medical evidence requires more than medical discourse and professional considerations. This paper looks at the production processes and use of medical evidence and the ambiguous meaning of this term in practical medicine.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16808424     DOI: 10.1515/CAM.2006.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Commun Med        ISSN: 1612-1783


  5 in total

1.  What is a medical decision? A taxonomy based on physician statements in hospital encounters: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Eirik H Ofstad; Jan C Frich; Edvin Schei; Richard M Frankel; Pål Gulbrandsen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 2.692

2.  Clinical decisions presented to patients in hospital encounters: a cross-sectional study using a novel taxonomy.

Authors:  Eirik Hugaas Ofstad; Jan C Frich; Edvin Schei; Richard M Frankel; Jūratė Šaltytė Benth; Pål Gulbrandsen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 2.692

3.  'Not at the diagnosis point': Dealing with contradiction in autism assessment teams.

Authors:  Jennie Hayes; Rose McCabe; Tamsin Ford; Daisy Parker; Ginny Russell
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 4.634

4.  Flexible knowledge repertoires: communication by leaders in trauma teams.

Authors:  Maritha Jacobsson; Maria Hargestam; Magnus Hultin; Christine Brulin
Journal:  Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med       Date:  2012-07-02       Impact factor: 2.953

5.  A social-technological epistemology of clinical decision-making as mediated by imaging.

Authors:  Sophie van Baalen; Annamaria Carusi; Ian Sabroe; David G Kiely
Journal:  J Eval Clin Pract       Date:  2016-10-03       Impact factor: 2.431

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.