Literature DB >> 16808197

Advantages of laparoscopic appendectomy in the elderly.

Andrew G Harrell1, Amy E Lincourt, Yuri W Novitsky, Michael J Rosen, Timothy S Kuwada, Kent W Kercher, Ronald F Sing, B Todd Heniford.   

Abstract

Laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) has gained in popularity in recent years. The number of elderly patients undergoing appendectomy has increased as that segment of the population has increased in number; however, the utility and benefits of LA in the elderly population are not well established. We hypothesized that LA in the elderly has distinctive advantages in perioperative outcomes over open appendectomy (OA). We queried the 1997 to 2003 North Carolina Hospital Association Patient Data System for all patients with the primary ICD-9 procedure code for OA and LA. Patients > or = 65 years of age (elderly) were identified and reviewed. Outcomes including length of stay (LOS), charges, complications, discharge location, and mortality were compared between the groups. There were 29,244 appendectomies performed in adult patients (>18 years old) with 2,722 of these in the elderly. The annual percentage of LA performed in the elderly increased from 1997 to 2003 (11.9-26.9%, P < 0.0001). When compared with OA, elderly patients undergoing LA had a shorter LOS (4.6 vs 7.3 days, P = 0.0001), a higher rate of discharge to home (91.4 vs 78.9%, P = 0.0001) as opposed to a step-down facility, fewer complications (13.0 vs 22.4%, P = 0.0001), and a lower mortality rate (0.4 vs 2.1%, P = 0.007). When LA was compared with OA in elderly patients with perforated appendicitis, LA resulted in a shorter LOS (6.8 vs 9.0 days, P = 0.0001), a higher rate of discharge to home (86.6 vs 70.9%, P = 0.0001), but equivalent total charges (dollars 22,334 vs dollars 23,855, P = 0.93) and mortality (1.0 vs 2.98%, P = 0.10). When elderly patients that underwent LA were compared with adult patients (18-64 years old), they had higher total charges (dollars 16,670 vs dollars 11,160, P = 0.0001) but equivalent mortality (0.37 vs 0.15%, P = 0.20). The use of laparoscopy in the elderly has significantly increased in recent years. In general, the safety and efficacy of LA is demonstrated by a reduction in mortality, complications, and LOS when compared with OA. The laparoscopic approach to the perforated appendix in the elderly patient has advantages over OA in terms of decreased LOS and a higher rate of discharge to home as opposed to rehabilitation centers, nursing homes, or skilled nursing care. When compared with all younger adults, the laparoscopic approach in the elderly was associated with equal mortality rates even though hospitalization charges were higher. Laparoscopy may be the preferred approach in elderly patients who require appendectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16808197

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Surg        ISSN: 0003-1348            Impact factor:   0.688


  17 in total

1.  Does laparoscopic appendectomy impart an advantage over open appendectomy in elderly patients?

Authors:  Hossein Masoomi; Steven Mills; Matthew O Dolich; Noor Ketana; Joseph C Carmichael; Ninh T Nguyen; Michael J Stamos
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Laparoscopic appendectomy for acute appendicitis is more favorable for patients with comorbidities, the elderly, and those with complicated appendicitis: a nationwide population-based study.

Authors:  Chun-Chieh Yeh; Shih-Chi Wu; Chien-Chang Liao; Li-Ting Su; Chi-Hsun Hsieh; Tsai-Chung Li
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-03-18       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Regional anesthesia for laparoscopic surgery: a narrative review.

Authors:  George Vretzakis; Metaxia Bareka; Diamanto Aretha; Menelaos Karanikolas
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 2.078

4.  The association of the number of comorbidities and complications with length of stay, hospital mortality and LOS high outlier, based on administrative data.

Authors:  Kazuaki Kuwabara; Yuichi Imanaka; Shinya Matsuda; Kiyohide Fushimi; Hideki Hashimoto; Koichi B Ishikawa; Hiromasa Horiguchi; Kenshi Hayashida; Kenji Fujimori
Journal:  Environ Health Prev Med       Date:  2008-03-29       Impact factor: 3.674

5.  [Appendicitis in the elderly. CRP value as decision support for diagnostic laparoscopy].

Authors:  D Sülberg; A M Chromik; S Kersting; K Meurer; A Tannapfel; W Uhl; U Mittelkötter
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 0.955

6.  Laparoscopic appendectomy is safe and efficacious for the elderly: an analysis using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Project database.

Authors:  Michael J Kim; Fergal J Fleming; Douglas D Gunzler; Susan Messing; Rabih M Salloum; John R T Monson
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Acute appendicitis in the elderly in the twenty-first century.

Authors:  Lior Segev; Andrei Keidar; Ilan Schrier; Shlomi Rayman; Nir Wasserberg; Eran Sadot
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-02-14       Impact factor: 3.452

8.  Thirty-day outcomes of laparoscopic versus open appendectomy in elderly using ACS/NSQIP database.

Authors:  Ashkan Moazzez; Rodney J Mason; Namir Katkhouda
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-10-06       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Comparison of clinical outcomes of open, laparoscopic and single port appendicectomies.

Authors:  X Jiang; H B Meng; D L Zhou; W X Ding; L S Lu
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 1.891

10.  ERAT: A New ERA for Appendicitis Therapy?

Authors:  Doumit S BouHaidar; Muhammad Z Bawany; Mitchell L Schubert
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 3.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.