| Literature DB >> 16806602 |
Matthew J Giacalone1, Roger A Sabbadini, Amy L Chambers, Sabitha Pillai, Neil L Berkley, Mark W Surber, Kathleen L McGuire.
Abstract
Recent events surrounding emerging infectious diseases, bioterrorism and increasing multidrug antibiotic resistance in bacteria have drastically increased current needs for effective vaccines. Many years of study have shown that live, attenuated pathogens are often more effective at delivering heterologous protein or DNA to induce protective immune responses. However, these vaccine carriers have inherent safety concerns that have limited their development and their use in many patient populations. Studies using nonliving delivery mechanisms have shown that providing both protein antigen and DNA encoding the antigen to an individual induces an improved, more protective immune response but rarely, if ever, are both delivered simultaneously. Here, non-replicating bacterial minicells derived from a commensal E. coli strain are shown to effectively induce antigen-specific immune responses after simultaneous protein and DNA delivery. These data demonstrate the potential use of achromosomal bacterial minicells as a vaccine carrier.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2006 PMID: 16806602 PMCID: PMC7125846 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2006.04.063
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vaccine ISSN: 0264-410X Impact factor: 3.641
Description of plasmids used in this study
| Designation | Characteristics | Source |
|---|---|---|
| pRHA-67 | Rhamnose inducible prokaryotic expression vector, AmpR | Mpex Pharmaceuticals, Inc. |
| pRHA-67:: | GFP expressed under rhamnose inducible promoter, AmpR | Mpex Pharmaceuticals, Inc. |
| pMJG3 | Codon optimized GFP expressed under eukaryotic (CMV) control, AmpR | This work |
| pGFPVAX | GFP expressed from rhamnose inducible prokaryotic promoter and codon optimized GFP expressed under eukaryotic (CMV) promoter control | This work |
| pGFPM5 | GFP with C-terminal his 6X tag under | Dr. Robert Zeller |
Fig. 2GFP-specific IgG from sera of immunized mice. (a) Mice were immunized 3 times i.m. (day 0, 14, 28) with minicells containing both soluble GFP protein and plasmid DNA (MC DNA/Protein), the eukaryotic expression cassette driving GFP expression (MC DNA), recombinantly expressed GFP protein (MC Protein) or empty vector controls (MC EV). Control groups were immunized 3 times i.m. with either plasmid DNA (naked DNA) or not at all (naïve). Serum was harvested at day 35 and GFP-specific IgG antibodies were detected by ELISA. (b) GFP-specific IgG from sera is detectable from a single dose administration. Mice were immunized one time i.m. as described and GFP-specific antibody detected by ELISA on day 21. Titers for both experiments were calculated as described in Section 2. *p < 0.05 compared against naïve group. †p < 0.05 compared against all groups tested.
Fig. 3GFP-specific responses from mice immunized via the intramuscular, intranasal or oral route. Mice were immunized three times (day 0, 14, and 28) each with minicells containing both soluble GFP protein and the plasmid designed for eukaryotic expression (the MC DNA/Protein vaccine of Fig. 2) by i.m., i.n. or p.o. routes. The mode of administration influences the site of Ab production. (a) GFP-specific IgG antibodies detected in the sera of immunized mice (i.m. administration demonstrates the highest titers) at day 35. (b) GFP-specific IgA antibodies detected in the nasal wash of immunized mice (i.n. administration only) at day 35. (c) GFP-specific IgA antibodies detected in the intestinal lavage fluid of immunized mice (p.o. administration only) at day 35. Serum IgG titers an relative IgA levels were calculated as described in Section 2. *p < 0.05 compared against naïve group. †p < 0.05 compared against all groups tested.
Fig. 1Minicell production, isolation, internalization and transfer of DNA to cultured APC. (a) The minicell production process. MPX1B9 cells containing pRHA-67::GFP were co-induced to express soluble GFP while producing minicells. The budding and purification process was followed by visualizing GFP-containing minicells. The top left panel shows MPX1B9 cells that express GFP in the absence of inducing minicell formation. The bottom left panel shows the same culture three generations after inducing minicell production. The inlay demonstrates a budding event from the polar region of the parent cell. Purified minicells containing soluble GFP are in the bottom right panel. The table summarizes the results of minicell vaccine formulation testing. The amounts of protein antigen and plasmid DNA contained within the indicated minicell vaccines are shown. Results are from three independent experiments using 1010 minicells per experiment. (b) SYBR gold stained minicells were incubated with J774A.1 for various times. The lower panel shows J774A.1 cells incubated with SYBR gold stained minicells for 90 min. The addition of minicells containing no plasmid DNA was used as a negative control (top). (c) BMDDC were analyzed for GFP expression 48 h after incubating with minicells harboring the expression plasmid. The bottom panel shows BMDDC expressing the GFP transgene delivered by minicells at an M.O.I. of 10,000. APC incubated with minicells containing empty vector plasmid pRHA-67 serve as the negative control (top).