Literature DB >> 16804852

A comparison of miltefosine and sodium stibogluconate for treatment of visceral leishmaniasis in an Ethiopian population with high prevalence of HIV infection.

Koert Ritmeijer1, Abren Dejenie, Yibeltal Assefa, Tadesse Beyene Hundie, Jo Mesure, Gerry Boots, Margriet den Boer, Robert N Davidson.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Antimonials are the mainstay of visceral leishmaniasis (VL) treatment in Africa. The increasing incidence of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) coinfection requires alternative safe and effective drug regimens. Oral miltefosine has been proven to be safe and effective in the treatment of Indian VL but has not been studied in Africa or in persons with HIV and VL coinfection.
METHODS: We compared the efficacy of miltefosine and sodium stibogluconate (SSG) in the treatment of VL in persons in Ethiopia. A total of 580 men with parasitologically and/or serologically confirmed VL were randomized to receive either oral miltefosine (100 mg per day for 28 days) or intramuscular SSG (20 mg/kg per day for 30 days).
RESULTS: The initial cure rate was 88% in both treatment groups. Mortality during treatment was 2% in the miltefosine group, compared with 10% in the SSG group. Initial treatment failure was 8% in the miltefosine group, compared with 1% in the SSG group. Among the 375 patients (65%) who agreed to HIV testing, HIV seroprevalence was 29%. Among patients not infected with HIV, initial cure, mortality, and initial treatment failure rates were not significantly different (94% vs. 95%, 1% vs. 3%, and 5% vs. 1% for the miltefosine and SSG groups, respectively). Initial treatment failure with miltefosine occurred in 18% of HIV-coinfected patients, compared with treatment failure in 5% of non-HIV-infected patients. At 6 months after treatment, 174 (60%) of the 290 miltefosine recipients and 189 (65%) of the 290 SSG recipients experienced cure; 30 (10%) of 290 in the miltefosine group and 7 (2%) of 290 in the SSG group experienced relapse, and the mortality rate was 6% in the miltefosine group, compared with 12% in the SSG group. HIV-infected patients had higher rates of relapse (16 [25%] of 63 patients), compared with non-HIV-infected patients (5 [5%] of 131).
CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with miltefosine is equally effective as standard SSG treatment in non-HIV-infected men with VL. Among HIV-coinfected patients, miltefosine is safer but less effective than SSG.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16804852     DOI: 10.1086/505217

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Infect Dis        ISSN: 1058-4838            Impact factor:   9.079


  59 in total

1.  Mechanism of amphotericin B resistance in clinical isolates of Leishmania donovani.

Authors:  Bidyut Purkait; Ashish Kumar; Nilay Nandi; Abul Hasan Sardar; Sushmita Das; Sudeep Kumar; Krishna Pandey; Vidyananda Ravidas; Manish Kumar; Tripti De; Dharmendra Singh; Pradeep Das
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2011-11-28       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Alternative drug treatments for visceral leishmaniasis: miltefosine.

Authors:  Mary E Wilson
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.725

Review 3.  Recent developments in drug discovery for leishmaniasis and human African trypanosomiasis.

Authors:  Advait S Nagle; Shilpi Khare; Arun Babu Kumar; Frantisek Supek; Andriy Buchynskyy; Casey J N Mathison; Naveen Kumar Chennamaneni; Nagendar Pendem; Frederick S Buckner; Michael H Gelb; Valentina Molteni
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 60.622

Review 4.  Chemotherapeutics of visceral leishmaniasis: present and future developments.

Authors:  Shyam Sundar; Anup Singh
Journal:  Parasitology       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 3.234

5.  [Kala azar - Lethal course of visceral leishmaniasis. Synchronous infection with Leishmania donovani/infantum complex and Leishmania major in a patient after Mediterranean vacation].

Authors:  C Posch; J Walochnik; A Gschnait; H Feichtinger; K Rappersberger
Journal:  Hautarzt       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 0.751

6.  Treatment of visceral leishmaniasis.

Authors:  E M Moore; D N Lockwood
Journal:  J Glob Infect Dis       Date:  2010-05

7.  Visceral leishmaniasis relapse in Southern Sudan (1999-2007): a retrospective study of risk factors and trends.

Authors:  Stanislaw Gorski; Simon M Collin; Koert Ritmeijer; Kees Keus; Francis Gatluak; Marius Mueller; Robert N Davidson
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2010-06-08

8.  Pharmacotherapeutic options for visceral leishmaniasis-current scenario.

Authors:  Krishna Pandey; Prabhat Kumar Sinha; Vidyanand Ravi Das; Sanjiva Bimal; Shubhankar K Singh; Pradeep Das
Journal:  Clin Med Pathol       Date:  2009-01-23

9.  Human immunodeficiency virus and leishmaniasis.

Authors:  Navid Ezra; Maria Teresa Ochoa; Noah Craft
Journal:  J Glob Infect Dis       Date:  2010-09

Review 10.  Drug resistance in visceral leishmaniasis.

Authors:  Helena C Maltezou
Journal:  J Biomed Biotechnol       Date:  2009-11-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.