Literature DB >> 16803945

What is quality in surgical pathology?

R E Nakhleh.   

Abstract

Quality in surgical pathology may be defined as accurate, timely, and complete reports. Achieving quality requires substantial investment in the basic structure and in the people who undertake surgical pathology. Quality assurance and improvement works best when it is woven into the systems of surgical pathology with well informed, well trained, and knowledgeable staff.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2006        PMID： 16803945      PMCID： PMC1860419          DOI： 10.1136/jcp.2005.031385

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Pathol        ISSN： 0021-9746            Impact factor:   3.411


  15 in total

1.  Consensual interpretive guidelines for diagnostic immunohistochemistry.

Authors:  M R Wick; S E Mills
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 6.394

2.  The implementation of guidelines and computerised forms improves the completeness of cancer pathology reporting. The CROPS project: a randomised controlled trial in pathology.

Authors:  L K Branston; S Greening; R G Newcombe; R Daoud; J M Abraham; F Wood; N S Dallimore; J Steward; C Rogers; G T Williams
Journal:  Eur J Cancer       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 9.162

3.  Evidence-based medicine, medical decision analysis, and pathology.

Authors:  Alberto M Marchevsky; Mark R Wick
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.466

4.  Error detection in anatomic pathology.

Authors:  Richard J Zarbo; Frederick A Meier; Stephen S Raab
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 5.534

5.  Intralaboratory timeliness of surgical pathology reports. Results of two College of American Pathologists Q-Probes studies of biopsies and complex specimens.

Authors:  R J Zarbo; G N Gephardt; P J Howanitz
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 5.534

6.  Necessity of clinical information in surgical pathology.

Authors:  R E Nakhleh; G Gephardt; R J Zarbo
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 5.534

7.  Mammographically directed breast biopsies: a College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of clinical physician expectations and of specimen handling and reporting characteristics in 434 institutions.

Authors:  R E Nakhleh; B Jones; R J Zarbo
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 5.534

8.  Customer satisfaction in anatomic pathology. A College of American Pathologists Q-Probes study of 3065 physician surveys from 94 laboratories.

Authors:  Richard J Zarbo; Raouf E Nakhleh; Molly Walsh
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 5.534

9.  The quality case for information technology in healthcare.

Authors:  David W Bates
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2002-10-23       Impact factor: 2.796

10.  SYNOPSIS OF MEDICAL STATISTICS: From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ann Ib Postgrad Med       Date:  2008-06
View more
  10 in total

1.  The feasibility of computer-aided monitoring of the workflow in surgical pathology: a five-year experience.

Authors:  Chih-En Tseng; Hsiu-Huei Chiang; Liang-Yu Shih; Kai-Sheng Liao
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2014-02-04       Impact factor: 4.460

2.  Quality Measures in Pre-Analytical Phase of Tissue Processing: Understanding Its Value in Histopathology.

Authors:  Shalinee Rao; Suresh Masilamani; Sandhya Sundaram; Prathiba Duvuru; Rajendiran Swaminathan
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2016-01-01

3.  The value of histological examination in the diagnosis of tuberculous lymphadenitis in the era of rapid molecular diagnosis.

Authors:  Sabira Tahseen; Atiqa Ambreen; Sheeba Ishtiaq; Faisal M Khanzada; Nauman Safdar; Lisbet Sviland; Tehmina Mustafa
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-27       Impact factor: 4.996

4.  From Reactive Lymphadenopathy to Systemic Vasculitis, the Importance of Providing Sufficient Clinical Information to Optimize Pathological Interpretation, a Case Report.

Authors:  Neda Soleimani; Maral Mokhtari; Sahand Mohammadzadeh
Journal:  Int Med Case Rep J       Date:  2020-01-09

Review 5.  A literature review of quality, costs, process-associated with digital pathology.

Authors:  Yoo Jung Kim; Eul Hee Roh; Sangchan Park
Journal:  J Exerc Rehabil       Date:  2021-02-23

6.  Is routine histopathological examination of FESS material useful?

Authors:  Cindy van den Boer; Guy Brutel; Nico de Vries
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009-09-18       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 7.  Quality and safety aspects in histopathology laboratory.

Authors:  Soniya Adyanthaya; Maji Jose
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Pathol       Date:  2013-09

8.  Reducing turnaround time of surgical pathology reports in pathology and laboratory medicine departments.

Authors:  Saeed Alshieban; Khaled Al-Surimi
Journal:  BMJ Qual Improv Rep       Date:  2015-11-24

9.  Quality of Breast Cancer Surgical Pathology Reports

Authors:  Anita Vallacha; Ghulam Haider; Wiky Raja; Dinesh Kumar
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2018-03-27

10.  Impact of Clinical Information on the Turnaround Time in Surgical Histopathology: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Syed Muhammad Hammad Ali; Usama Muhammad Kathia; Muhammad Umar Masood Gondal; Ahsan Zil-E-Ali; Haseeb Khan; Sabiha Riaz
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2018-05-08
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.