Literature DB >> 16803652

Quantitation of cotinine in nonsmoker saliva using chip-based nanoelectrospray tandem mass spectrometry.

Bruce A Tomkins1, Gary J Van Berkel, Roger A Jenkins, Richard W Counts.   

Abstract

A new analytical procedure was developed for the quantitation of nonsmoker salivary cotinine. Small volumes of saliva were diluted with water, fortified with cotinine-d3 (internal standard), then passed through small extraction columns. The analyte and internal standard were eluted with 0.1% (v/v) acetic acid/acetonitrile. Aliquots of each extract were analyzed directly, without chromatographic separation, using chip-based (NanoMate) nanospray tandem mass spectrometry. The calculated detection limit was 0.49 ng cotinine/mL saliva. This method was used to quantify salivary cotinine collected from nonsmoking human subjects living in one of three environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) exposure categories or "cells": 1. smoking home/smoking workplace; 2. smoking home/nonsmoking workplace; and 3. nonsmoking home/smoking workplace. Samples were collected during five sequential days, including Saturday, as part of a larger study to evaluate potential variability in exposure to ETS. Salivary cotinine measurements were made for the purpose of excluding misclassified smokers and for comparison with known levels of exposure to airborne nicotine in each exposure category. The concentrations observed were consistent with those reported from other large studies reported elsewhere. A non-parametric statistical test was applied to the data within each cell. No statistically significant differences were found between the mean cotinine concentrations collected on a weekday as compared to those collected on a weekend day. When the non-parametric test was applied to the three cells, a statistically significant difference was observed between cell 1 compared to cells 2 and 3. The salivary cotinine concentrations were thus statistically invariant over a five-day exposure period, and they were greatest under the conditions of smoking home and smoking workplace.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16803652     DOI: 10.1093/jat/30.3.178

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anal Toxicol        ISSN: 0146-4760            Impact factor:   3.367


  7 in total

Review 1.  Modern instrumental methods in forensic toxicology.

Authors:  Michael L Smith; Shawn P Vorce; Justin M Holler; Eric Shimomura; Joe Magluilo; Aaron J Jacobs; Marilyn A Huestis
Journal:  J Anal Toxicol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 3.367

2.  Development of a high-throughput IMS-IMS-MS approach for analyzing mixtures of biomolecules.

Authors:  Ruwan T Kurulugama; Stephen J Valentine; Rena A Sowell; David E Clemmer
Journal:  J Proteomics       Date:  2008-06-25       Impact factor: 4.044

3.  Acute cardiovascular autonomic responses to inhaled particulates.

Authors:  Joyce M Evans; Roger A Jenkins; Ralph H Ilgner; Charles F Knapp; Qingguang Zhang; Abhijit R Patwardhan
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2014-10-02       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Paper Spray Mass Spectrometry for High-Throughput Quantification of Nicotine and Cotinine.

Authors:  James E Keating; John T Minges; Scott H Randell; Gary L Glish
Journal:  Anal Methods       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 2.896

5.  Response normalized liquid chromatography nanospray ionization mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Ragu Ramanathan; Ruyun Zhong; Neil Blumenkrantz; Swapan K Chowdhury; Kevin B Alton
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2007-07-29       Impact factor: 3.109

6.  Saliva as an analytical tool to measure occupational exposure to toluene.

Authors:  M Ferrari; S Negri; P Zadra; S Ghittori; M Imbriani
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2008-01-03       Impact factor: 3.015

7.  Current literature in mass spectrometry.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Mass Spectrom       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 1.982

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.