Literature DB >> 16801302

Adolescent smokers screened for a nicotine replacement treatment trial: correlates of eligibility and enrollment.

Miqun L Robinson1, Jennifer R Schroeder, Eric T Moolchan.   

Abstract

The enrollment process determines the study sample and external validity of clinical trial results; however, few reports describe the process and outcome of screening efforts for smoking cessation studies among adolescents. We describe and evaluate a screening protocol to enroll adolescent smokers for a randomized clinical trial of nicotine replacement therapy. Adolescent smokers obtained the recruitment call-in number (1-800-NO-SMOKE) via media and other advertisements. Trained recruitment staff collected information using an internally developed, targeted telephone screening interview, which was used to determine pre-eligibility for the clinical trial. Correlates of qualification and of study enrollment were determined. Among 1,347 adolescents screened, 329 (24.4%) were eligible to participate in the trial. Light smoking (39.1%) and lack of parental support (14.8%) were the biggest contributors to ineligibility. Eligible adolescents were more likely to be female (66.9% vs. 58.2%, p = .0052) and more likely to be European American (63.5% vs. 52.2%, p = .0003). The higher rates of ineligibility for African Americans and boys were partly explained by lower scores on the Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence. Of those eligible to participate in the trial, 159 (48.3%) enrolled. Results underscore the need for screening instruments that are measurement-invariant across ethnicities and gender, and for enrollment strategies that maximize inclusion of eligible participants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16801302     DOI: 10.1080/14622200600670413

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nicotine Tob Res        ISSN: 1462-2203            Impact factor:   4.244


  7 in total

1.  Is the Fagerström test for nicotine dependence invariant across secular trends in smoking? A question for cross-birth cohort analysis of nicotine dependence.

Authors:  Cristie Glasheen; Eric O Johnson; Nancy L Saccone; Sharon M Lutz; Timothy B Baker; Daniel W McNeil; Mary L Marazita; John E Hokanson; Laura J Bierut; Dana B Hancock
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 4.492

2.  Different doses, durations and modes of delivery of nicotine replacement therapy for smoking cessation.

Authors:  Nicola Lindson; Samantha C Chepkin; Weiyu Ye; Thomas R Fanshawe; Chris Bullen; Jamie Hartmann-Boyce
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-04-18

Review 3.  Interventions for preventing weight gain after smoking cessation.

Authors:  Jamie Hartmann-Boyce; Annika Theodoulou; Amanda Farley; Peter Hajek; Deborah Lycett; Laura L Jones; Laura Kudlek; Laura Heath; Anisa Hajizadeh; Marika Schenkels; Paul Aveyard
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-10-06

Review 4.  Nicotine replacement therapy versus control for smoking cessation.

Authors:  Jamie Hartmann-Boyce; Samantha C Chepkin; Weiyu Ye; Chris Bullen; Tim Lancaster
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-05-31

Review 5.  Tobacco cessation interventions for young people.

Authors:  Thomas R Fanshawe; William Halliwell; Nicola Lindson; Paul Aveyard; Jonathan Livingstone-Banks; Jamie Hartmann-Boyce
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-11-17

6.  Inclusion of Cannabis Users in Alcohol Research Samples: Screening In, Screening Out, and Implications.

Authors:  Alexandra Venegas; Lindsay R Meredith; Ziva D Cooper; Brandon Towns; Lara A Ray
Journal:  Alcohol Alcohol       Date:  2020-06-25       Impact factor: 3.913

7.  Communication inequalities, social determinants, and intermittent smoking in the 2003 Health Information National Trends Survey.

Authors:  Leland K Ackerson; Kasisomayajula Viswanath
Journal:  Prev Chronic Dis       Date:  2009-03-16       Impact factor: 2.830

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.