Literature DB >> 16801204

Motor performance in physically well-recovered men with traumatic brain injury.

Marjo B Rinne1, Matti E Pasanen, Matti V Vartiainen, Tommi M Lehto, Jaana M Sarajuuri, Hannu T Alaranta.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The primary aim of this study was to compare the motor performance of physically well-recovered men with traumatic brain injury with that of healthy men.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional study in a national rehabilitation centre.
METHODS: Static and dynamic balance, agility and rhythm co-ordination of men with traumatic brain injury (n=34) and healthy controls (n=36) were assessed. Between-group differences in dynamic balance and agility were analysed by analysis of covariance and differences in static balance and rhythm co-ordination by logistic regression analysis. Cut-off points for clinical screening were determined by receiver operating characteristics analyses.
RESULTS: Men with traumatic brain injury had impaired balance and agility compared with healthy men and in a rhythm co-ordination test they had difficulties in starting and sustaining simultaneous rhythmical movements of hands and feet. In receiver operating characteristics analyses a running figure-of-eight test (agility), tandem walking forwards (dynamic balance) and rhythm co-ordination test with fast tempo were found the most sensitive and specific for distinguishing between men with traumatic brain injury and the healthy men.
CONCLUSIONS: The impairments in motor performance of physically well-recovered patients with traumatic brain injury were obvious. The results of this study extend the knowledge of problems in motor performance among patients with traumatic brain injury and provide further information for clinical rehabilitation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16801204     DOI: 10.1080/16501970600582989

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Rehabil Med        ISSN: 1650-1977            Impact factor:   2.912


  6 in total

Review 1.  Endurance training and cardiorespiratory conditioning after traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Kurt A Mossberg; William E Amonette; Brent E Masel
Journal:  J Head Trauma Rehabil       Date:  2010 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.710

2.  Tests of static balance do not predict mobility performance following traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Gavin P Williams; Meg E Morris
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2011-01-20       Impact factor: 1.037

3.  Effects of a progressive aquatic resistance exercise program on the biochemical composition and morphology of cartilage in women with mild knee osteoarthritis: protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Benjamin Waller; Matti Munukka; Juhani Multanen; Timo Rantalainen; Tapani Pöyhönen; Miika T Nieminen; Ilkka Kiviranta; Hannu Kautiainen; Harri Selänne; Joost Dekker; Sarianna Sipilä; Urho M Kujala; Arja Häkkinen; Ari Heinonen
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2013-03-07       Impact factor: 2.362

4.  Diagnostic accuracy of tablet-based software for the detection of concussion.

Authors:  Suosuo Yang; Benjamin Flores; Rotem Magal; Kyrsti Harris; Jonathan Gross; Amy Ewbank; Sasha Davenport; Pablo Ormachea; Waleed Nasser; Weidong Le; W Frank Peacock; Yael Katz; David M Eagleman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-07       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Gait Quality Assessment in Survivors from Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: An Instrumented Approach Based on Inertial Sensors.

Authors:  Valeria Belluscio; Elena Bergamini; Marco Tramontano; Amaranta Orejel Bustos; Giulia Allevi; Rita Formisano; Giuseppe Vannozzi; Maria Gabriella Buzzi
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2019-12-03       Impact factor: 3.576

6.  Normative data for the balance error scoring system in adults.

Authors:  Grant L Iverson; Michael S Koehle
Journal:  Rehabil Res Pract       Date:  2013-03-18
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.