Literature DB >> 16799130

A risk assessment of two interorganizational clinical information systems.

Claude Sicotte1, Guy Paré, Marie-Pierre Moreault, André Paccioni.   

Abstract

A risk analysis framework was used to examine the implementation barriers that may hamper the successful implementation of interorganizational clinical information systems (ICIS). In terms of study design, an extensive literature review was first performed in order to elaborate a comprehensive model of project risk factors. To test the applicability of the model, we next conducted a longitudinal multiple-case study of two large-scale ICIS demonstration projects carried out in Quebec, Canada. Variations in the levels of several risk dimensions measured throughout the duration of the projects were analyzed to determine their impact on successful implementation. The analysis shows that the proposed framework, composed of five risk dimensions, was very robust, and suitable for conducting a thorough risk analysis. The results also show that there are links between the quality of the risk management and the level of project outcomes. To be successful, it is important that the implementation efforts be distributed proportionally according to the importance of each of the risk factors. Furthermore, because the risks evolve dynamically, there is a need for high responsiveness to emerging implementation problems. Thus, implementation success lies in the ability of the project management team to be aware of and to manage several risk threats simultaneously and coherently since they evolve dynamically through time and interact with one another.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16799130      PMCID: PMC1561789          DOI: 10.1197/jamia.M2012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc        ISSN: 1067-5027            Impact factor:   4.497


  22 in total

1.  Controlled trial of direct physician order entry: effects on physicians' time utilization in ambulatory primary care internal medicine practices.

Authors:  J M Overhage; S Perkins; W M Tierney; C J McDonald
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2001 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Comparison of time spent writing orders on paper with computerized physician order entry.

Authors:  K Shu; D Boyle; C Spurr; J Horsky; H Heiman; P O'Connor; J Lepore; D W Bates
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2001

Review 3.  Determinants of success of inpatient clinical information systems: a literature review.

Authors:  M J Van Der Meijden; H J Tange; J Troost; A Hasman
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2003-01-28       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  The use of computers for clinical care: a case series of advanced U.S. sites.

Authors:  David F Doolan; David W Bates; Brent C James
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 5.  Grounding a new information technology implementation framework in behavioral science: a systematic analysis of the literature on IT use.

Authors:  Rita Kukafka; Stephen B Johnson; Allison Linfante; John P Allegrante
Journal:  J Biomed Inform       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 6.317

6.  Achievable steps toward building a National Health Information infrastructure in the United States.

Authors:  William W Stead; Brian J Kelly; Robert M Kolodner
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2004-11-23       Impact factor: 4.497

7.  The computer based patient record: a strategic issue in process innovation.

Authors:  C Sicotte; J L Denis; P Lehoux
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 4.460

8.  Smart technology, stunted policy: developing health information networks.

Authors:  P Starr
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  1997 May-Jun       Impact factor: 6.301

9.  Regional health information networks: the Wisconsin Health Information Network, a case study.

Authors:  K R Pemble
Journal:  Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care       Date:  1994

10.  The computer-based patient record challenges towards timeless and spaceless medical practice.

Authors:  C Sicotte; J L Denis; P Lehoux; F Champagne
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.460

View more
  7 in total

1.  A network collaboration implementing technology to improve medication dispensing and administration in critical access hospitals.

Authors:  Douglas S Wakefield; Marcia M Ward; Jean L Loes; John O'Brien
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2010 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Usability testing of a web-based tool for managing open shifts on nursing units.

Authors:  Po-Yin Yen; Suzanne Bakken
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2009

3.  Ten key considerations for the successful implementation and adoption of large-scale health information technology.

Authors:  Kathrin M Cresswell; David W Bates; Aziz Sheikh
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2013-04-18       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Integration of a nationally procured electronic health record system into user work practices.

Authors:  Kathrin M Cresswell; Allison Worth; Aziz Sheikh
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2012-03-08       Impact factor: 2.796

5.  Designing a Self-Management App for Young People With Type 1 Diabetes: Methodological Challenges, Experiences, and Recommendations.

Authors:  Pernille Castensøe-Seidenfaden; Gitte Reventlov Husted; Grete Teilmann; Eva Hommel; Birthe Susanne Olsen; Finn Kensing
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2017-10-23       Impact factor: 4.773

6.  Perceptions of telecare training needs in home healthcare services: a focus group study.

Authors:  Veslemøy Guise; Siri Wiig
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  Health Care Provider Adoption of eHealth: Systematic Literature Review.

Authors:  Junhua Li; Amir Talaei-Khoei; Holly Seale; Pradeep Ray; C Raina Macintyre
Journal:  Interact J Med Res       Date:  2013-04-16
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.