Literature DB >> 11604922

Comparison of time spent writing orders on paper with computerized physician order entry.

K Shu1, D Boyle, C Spurr, J Horsky, H Heiman, P O'Connor, J Lepore, D W Bates.   

Abstract

Computerized physician order entry (CPOE) has been shown to improve quality, and to reduce resource utilization, but most available data suggest that it takes longer to enter orders using CPOE. We had previously implemented a CPOE system, and elected to evaluate its impact on physician time in the new setting. To do this, we performed a prospective study using random reminder methodology. Key findings were that interns spent 9.0% of their time ordering with CPOE, compared to 2.1% before, although CPOE saved them an additional 2% of time, so that the net difference was 5% of their total time. However, this is counterbalanced by decreased time for other personnel such as nursing and pharmacy, and by the quality and efficiency changes. We conclude that while CPOE has many benefits, it represents a major process change, and organizations must factor this in when they implement it.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11604922

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform        ISSN: 0926-9630


  32 in total

1.  Computerized physician order entry: helpful or harmful?

Authors:  Robert G Berger; J P Kichak
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2003-11-21       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Ten commandments for effective clinical decision support: making the practice of evidence-based medicine a reality.

Authors:  David W Bates; Gilad J Kuperman; Samuel Wang; Tejal Gandhi; Anne Kittler; Lynn Volk; Cynthia Spurr; Ramin Khorasani; Milenko Tanasijevic; Blackford Middleton
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2003-08-04       Impact factor: 4.497

3.  Impacts of computerized physician documentation in a teaching hospital: perceptions of faculty and resident physicians.

Authors:  Peter J Embi; Thomas R Yackel; Judith R Logan; Judith L Bowen; Thomas G Cooney; Paul N Gorman
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2004-04-02       Impact factor: 4.497

4.  Quantifying the impact of health IT implementations on clinical workflow: a new methodological perspective.

Authors:  Kai Zheng; Hilary M Haftel; Ronald B Hirschl; Michael O'Reilly; David A Hanauer
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  Prioritizing Paperwork Over Patient Care: Why Can't We Do Both?

Authors:  James E Siegler; Neha N Patel; C Jessica Dine
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2015-03

6.  Information retrieval performance of probabilistically generated, problem-specific computerized provider order entry pick-lists: a pilot study.

Authors:  Adam S Rothschild; Harold P Lehmann
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2005-01-31       Impact factor: 4.497

7.  David Westfall Bates, MD: a conversation with the editor on improving patient safety, quality of care, and outcomes by using information technology. Interview by William Clifford Roberts.

Authors:  David Westfall Bates
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2005-04

8.  The effect of computerized provider order entry on medical student clerkship experiences.

Authors:  Amy M Knight; Steven J Kravet; G Michael Harper; Bruce Leff
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2005-05-19       Impact factor: 4.497

9.  Impact of electronic health record technology on the work and workflow of physicians in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Pascale Carayon; Tosha B Wetterneck; Bashar Alyousef; Roger L Brown; Randi S Cartmill; Kerry McGuire; Peter L T Hoonakker; Jason Slagle; Kara S Van Roy; James M Walker; Matthew B Weinger; Anping Xie; Kenneth E Wood
Journal:  Int J Med Inform       Date:  2015-04-15       Impact factor: 4.046

10.  Computerised order entry systems and pathology services--a synthesis of the evidence.

Authors:  Andrew Georgiou; Johanna I Westbrook
Journal:  Clin Biochem Rev       Date:  2006-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.