Literature DB >> 16799017

In vivo corneal confocal microscopy comparison of intralase femtosecond laser and mechanical microkeratome for laser in situ keratomileusis.

Bertrand Sonigo1, Vasiliki Iordanidou, Didier Chong-Sit, Francois Auclin, Jean Marc Ancel, Antoine Labbé, Christophe Baudouin.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess and compare corneal modifications induced by IntraLase PulsionFS femtosecond laser and mechanical microkeratome Hansatome for laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) using the new-generation Heidelberg Retina Tomograph II (HRT II)/Rostock Cornea Module confocal microscope.
METHODS: In this case-control study, 24 eyes of 12 patients were examined with the HRT II in the follow-up of IntraLase femtosecond laser for LASIK myopic surgery. Twenty eyes of 10 patients were also examined after microkeratome Hansatome-LASIK surgery. In both groups, the patients underwent the first follow-up examination on day 7 and the last 12 months after surgery. Morphologic modifications of corneal architecture were evaluated, and comparisons were made between the two flap-formation techniques.
RESULTS: Evaluation of both groups on day 7 showed keratocyte transformation, most likely related to cellular activation beneath the interface. The flap margin after the IntraLase technique appeared microscopically as a clear-cut edge that included the epithelial plug. At month 2, secondary fibrosis, adjacent to the still well-defined IntraLase flap edge, was observed. This reaction diminished with time, leaving a fibrotic scar adjacent to a wound constriction originating from the surrounding stroma. The flap margin of the mechanical microkeratome had the appearance of a less clearly identified fibrotic scar with no epithelial plug.
CONCLUSIONS: This study reveals morphologic similarities between the interfaces obtained by femtosecond laser and mechanical microkeratome, probably because the same excimer laser performed the photoablation. However, the IntraLase flap margin showed greater fibrotic scarring than that induced by the mechanical microkeratome.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16799017     DOI: 10.1167/iovs.05-1207

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci        ISSN: 0146-0404            Impact factor:   4.799


  19 in total

Review 1.  In vivo confocal microscopy of corneal nerves: analysis and clinical correlation.

Authors:  Andrea Cruzat; Deborah Pavan-Langston; Pedram Hamrah
Journal:  Semin Ophthalmol       Date:  2010 Sep-Nov       Impact factor: 1.975

2.  [Femtosecond laser in refractive surgery].

Authors:  H B Dick
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 3.  [Femtosecond laser for refractive corneal surgery: foundations, mode of action and clinical applications].

Authors:  M Mrochen; A Donges; G Korn
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.059

4.  Quantitative assessment of corneal wound healing following IntraLASIK using in vivo confocal microscopy.

Authors:  James P McCulley; W Matthew Petroll
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2008

5.  Corneal regeneration after femtosecond laser small-incision lenticule extraction: a prospective study.

Authors:  Manli Liu; Ting Zhang; Yugui Zhou; Yuan Sun; Danyang Wang; Hua Zheng; Quan Liu
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2015-03-07       Impact factor: 3.117

6.  Laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) with a mechanical microkeratome compared to LASIK with a femtosecond laser for LASIK in adults with myopia or myopic astigmatism.

Authors:  Nicolás Kahuam-López; Alejandro Navas; Carlos Castillo-Salgado; Enrique O Graue-Hernandez; Aida Jimenez-Corona; Antonio Ibarra
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-04-07

Review 7.  In Vivo Confocal Microscopy of Corneal Nerves in Health and Disease.

Authors:  Andrea Cruzat; Yureeda Qazi; Pedram Hamrah
Journal:  Ocul Surf       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 5.033

8.  Corneal flap morphological analysis using anterior segment optical coherence tomography in laser in situ keratomileusis with femtosecond lasers versus mechanical microkeratome.

Authors:  Xiao-Xiao Zhang; Xing-Wu Zhong; Jun-Shu Wu; Zheng Wang; Ke-Ming Yu; Quan Liu; Bin Yang
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2012-02-18       Impact factor: 1.779

9.  Corneal response to femtosecond laser photodisruption in the rabbit.

Authors:  Naoyuki Morishige; Anna Kesler-Diaz; Andrew J Wahlert; Ronald M Kurtz; Tibor Juhasz; Melvin Sarayba; James V Jester
Journal:  Exp Eye Res       Date:  2008-03-06       Impact factor: 3.467

10.  In vivo biopsy by laser confocal microscopy for evaluation of traumatic recurrent corneal erosion.

Authors:  Tai-ichiro Chikama; Norihisa Takahashi; Makiko Wakuta; Naoyuki Morishige; Teruo Nishida
Journal:  Mol Vis       Date:  2008-12-15       Impact factor: 2.367

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.