BACKGROUND: Patients with cardiogenic shock can be stabilized by percutaneous implantation of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). If weaning from ECMO is impossible, the implantation of a ventricular assist device (VAD) is required. Patients either go for recovery of myocardial function (bridge to recovery) or for heart transplantation (bridge to transplant). METHODS: One hundred thirty-one patients were supported with ECMO between March 1995 and November 2005. Reasons for ECMO implantation were acute heart failure, acute or chronic heart failure, and postcardiotomy heart failure. In 28 patients, subsequent VAD implantation was necessary (bridge to bridge concept). RESULTS: Fourteen bridge to bridge patients (50%) became long-time survivors with a mean follow-up of 39 months. Risk factors for mortality were status post-cardiopulmonary resuscitation and elevated lactate and bilirubin levels before VAD implantation. Complications after ECMO and VAD implantation were bleeding and thromboembolic events. The most common cause of death was multiorgan failure. CONCLUSIONS: Bridge to bridge is a successful concept for selected patients with cardiogenic shock. During ECMO support, patients can be evaluated for comorbidities. For patients with a combination of risk factors (status post-cardiopulmonary resuscitation, elevated lactate levels, and impaired liver function), VAD implantation should be considered very carefully.
BACKGROUND:Patients with cardiogenic shock can be stabilized by percutaneous implantation of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). If weaning from ECMO is impossible, the implantation of a ventricular assist device (VAD) is required. Patients either go for recovery of myocardial function (bridge to recovery) or for heart transplantation (bridge to transplant). METHODS: One hundred thirty-one patients were supported with ECMO between March 1995 and November 2005. Reasons for ECMO implantation were acute heart failure, acute or chronic heart failure, and postcardiotomy heart failure. In 28 patients, subsequent VAD implantation was necessary (bridge to bridge concept). RESULTS: Fourteen bridge to bridge patients (50%) became long-time survivors with a mean follow-up of 39 months. Risk factors for mortality were status post-cardiopulmonary resuscitation and elevated lactate and bilirubin levels before VAD implantation. Complications after ECMO and VAD implantation were bleeding and thromboembolic events. The most common cause of death was multiorgan failure. CONCLUSIONS: Bridge to bridge is a successful concept for selected patients with cardiogenic shock. During ECMO support, patients can be evaluated for comorbidities. For patients with a combination of risk factors (status post-cardiopulmonary resuscitation, elevated lactate levels, and impaired liver function), VAD implantation should be considered very carefully.
Authors: J Malcom O Arnold; Jonathan G Howlett; Paul Dorian; Anique Ducharme; Nadia Giannetti; Haissam Haddad; George A Heckman; Andrew Ignaszewski; Debra Isaac; Philip Jong; Peter Liu; Elizabeth Mann; Robert S McKelvie; Gordon W Moe; John D Parker; Anna M Svendsen; Ross T Tsuyuki; Kelly O'Halloran; Heather J Ross; Vivek Rao; Errol J Sequeira; Michel White Journal: Can J Cardiol Date: 2007-01 Impact factor: 5.223
Authors: Igor D Gregoric; Leon P Jacob; Saverio La Francesca; Brian A Bruckner; William E Cohn; Pranav Loyalka; Biswajit Kar; O H Frazier Journal: Tex Heart Inst J Date: 2008