Literature DB >> 16798057

The role of thymidine phosphorylase and uridine phosphorylase in (fluoro)pyrimidine metabolism in peripheral blood mononuclear cells.

O H Temmink1, M de Bruin, A C Laan, A W Turksma, S Cricca, A J Masterson, P Noordhuis, G J Peters.   

Abstract

Thymidine phosphorylase (TP) and uridine phosphorylase (UP) catalyze the (in)activation of several fluoropyrimidines, depending on their catalytic activity and substrate specificity. Blood cells are the first compartment exposed to most anticancer agents. The role of white blood cells in causing toxic side effects and catalyzing drug metabolism is generally underestimated. Therefore we determined the contribution of the white blood cell compartment to drug metabolism, and we investigated the activity and substrate specificity of TP and UP for the (fluoro)pyrimidines thymidine (dThd), uridine (Urd), 5'-deoxy-5-fluorouridine (5' dFUrd) and 5-fluorouracil (5FU) in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) and undifferentiated monocytes and differentiated monocytes: macrophages and dendritic cells. PBMC had an IC50 of 742 microM exposed to 5'dFUrd, increasing to > 2000 microM when both TP and UP activities were inhibited. Total phosphorolytic activity was higher with dThd than with Urd, 5'dFUrd or 5FU. Using a specific TP inhibitor (TPI) and UP inhibitor (BAU) we concluded that dThd and Urd were preferentially converted by TP and UP, respectively, while 5'dFUrd and 5FU were mainly converted by TP (about 80%) into 5FU and FUrd, respectively. 5FU was effectively incorporated into RNA. dThd conversion into thymine was highest in dendritic cells (52.6 nmol thymine/h/10(6) cells), followed by macrophages (two-fold) and undifferentiated monocytes (eight-fold). TPI prevented dThd conversion almost completely. In conclusion, PBMC were relatively insensitive to 5'dFUrd, and the natural substrates dThd and Urd were preferentially converted by TP and UP, respectively. TP and UP were both responsible for converting 5'dFUrd/5FU into 5FU/FUrd, respectively.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16798057     DOI: 10.1016/j.biocel.2006.04.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Biochem Cell Biol        ISSN: 1357-2725            Impact factor:   5.085


  6 in total

1.  Genome-wide mRNA and microRNA profiling of the NCI 60 cell-line screen and comparison of FdUMP[10] with fluorouracil, floxuridine, and topoisomerase 1 poisons.

Authors:  William H Gmeiner; William C Reinhold; Yves Pommier
Journal:  Mol Cancer Ther       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 6.261

2.  Crystallization and preliminary X-ray diffraction analysis of Salmonella typhimurium uridine phosphorylase complexed with 5-fluorouracil.

Authors:  A A Lashkov; A G Gabdoulkhakov; A A Shtil; A M Mikhailov
Journal:  Acta Crystallogr Sect F Struct Biol Cryst Commun       Date:  2009-05-22

Review 3.  Therapeutic drug monitoring of 5-fluorouracil.

Authors:  James J Lee; Jan H Beumer; Edward Chu
Journal:  Cancer Chemother Pharmacol       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 3.333

Review 4.  Therapeutic potential of TAS-102 in the treatment of gastrointestinal malignancies.

Authors:  Godefridus J Peters
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2015-11       Impact factor: 8.168

5.  Breed and adaptive response modulate bovine peripheral blood cells' transcriptome.

Authors:  Nataliya Pošćić; Tommaso Montanari; Mariasilvia D'Andrea; Danilo Licastro; Fabio Pilla; Paolo Ajmone-Marsan; Andrea Minuti; Sandy Sgorlon
Journal:  J Anim Sci Biotechnol       Date:  2017-01-25

Review 6.  Nucleobase and Nucleoside Analogues: Resistance and Re-Sensitisation at the Level of Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics and Metabolism.

Authors:  Nikolaos Tsesmetzis; Cynthia B J Paulin; Sean G Rudd; Nikolas Herold
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 6.639

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.