Literature DB >> 16797566

About the C term in the van Deemter's equation of plate height in monoliths.

A-M Siouffi1.   

Abstract

Monolithic stationary phases provide high rates of mass transfer at low pressure drops and enable much faster separations. Experimental data from published H versus u plots obtained with monolithic columns are compiled with an emphasis on the mass tranfer (C term of the van Deemter equation). Silica-based monoliths of the C18 Chromolith type exhibit a very low C value that does not vary too much within a wide range of flow rates. The C term is a function of retention, temperature, molecular weight of the solute and mesopore size. Silica-based monoliths of capillary format exhibit a slightly higher C value which slightly increases with increasing flow rates. The key parameter is the through-pore size/skeleton size ratio. Experimental data on polymer-based monoliths retrieved from the literature mostly concern acrylate-based material in a capillary format. Due to the unique character of every column the scatter of published C values is wide. The observed C term are higher than those observed with silica monoliths and increase quite linearly with the flow rate. Low-density polymers exhibit better performances than high-density polymers. The majority of HETP versus u plots are drawn from the peak width at half height. Accurate data should be acquired through the second moment of the peak. Some equations for C have been derived. An equivalent dispersion particle diameter is a measure of band broadening in the mesopores. Mass transfer in silica monoliths is well accounted by the theory developed by Guiochon et al.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16797566     DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2006.05.036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chromatogr A        ISSN: 0021-9673            Impact factor:   4.759


  5 in total

1.  Fast and universal HPLC method for determination of permethrin in formulations using 1.8-μm particle-packed column and performance comparison with other column types.

Authors:  Maja A Shishovska; Marina T Stefova
Journal:  J Chromatogr Sci       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.618

Review 2.  Less common applications of monoliths. III. Gas chromatography.

Authors:  Frantisek Svec; Alexander A Kurganov
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2007-07-13       Impact factor: 4.759

3.  Effect of bioparticle size on dispersion and retention in monolithic and perfusive beds.

Authors:  Egor I Trilisky; Abraham M Lenhoff
Journal:  J Chromatogr A       Date:  2010-09-19       Impact factor: 4.759

4.  PEO-based brush-type amphiphilic macro-RAFT agents and their assembled polyHIPE monolithic structures for applications in separation science.

Authors:  Aminreza Khodabandeh; R Dario Arrua; Fotouh R Mansour; Stuart C Thickett; Emily F Hilder
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 5.  Silica-Based Monolithic Columns as a Tool in HPLC-An Overview of Application in Analysis of Active Compounds in Biological Samples.

Authors:  Michał Staniak; Magdalena Wójciak; Ireneusz Sowa; Katarzyna Tyszczuk-Rotko; Maciej Strzemski; Sławomir Dresler; Wojciech Myśliński
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 4.411

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.