Literature DB >> 16796441

Robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy with the patient in the prone position.

Giovanni Dapri1, Jacques Himpens, Guy-Bernard Cadière.   

Abstract

We describe a new technique of esophagectomy by robot-assisted thoracoscopy with the patient in the prone position, followed by laparoscopy and left cervicotomy with the patient in the supine position. We report two procedures performed November 2002 and September 2003. The technique should allow more thorough lymph node removal while reducing postoperative pain and morbidity. The thoracoscopy is robot-assisted and the articulations within the pleural cavity improve the surgeon's dexterity and reduce trocar movements. The prone position allows mobilization of the esophagus with only three trocars because the lung, which is partially deflated, does not block access. With the patient in the prone position, bleeding does not obscure the operative field. Stomach mobilization, gastric tube creation, and celiac lymphadenectomy are performed by laparoscopy. The esogastric anastomosis is a totally mechanical side-to-side anastomosis realized by left cervicotomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16796441     DOI: 10.1089/lap.2006.16.278

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A        ISSN: 1092-6429            Impact factor:   1.878


  7 in total

1.  Technique of minimally invasive Ivor Lewis esophagogastrectomy with intrathoracic stapled side-to-side anastomosis.

Authors:  Kfir Ben-David; George A Sarosi; Juan C Cendan; Steven N Hochwald
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-06-08       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 2.  Thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the prone position.

Authors:  Omar A Jarral; Sanjay Purkayastha; Thanos Athanasiou; Ara Darzi; George B Hanna; Emmanouil Zacharakis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Lower Incidence of Postoperative Pulmonary Complications Following Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: Propensity Score-Matched Comparison to Conventional Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy.

Authors:  Shigeru Tsunoda; Kazutaka Obama; Shigeo Hisamori; Tatsuto Nishigori; Ryosuke Okamura; Hisatsugu Maekawa; Yoshiharu Sakai
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2020-09-05       Impact factor: 5.344

4.  Minimally invasive esophagectomy with cervical esophagogastric anastomosis.

Authors:  Steven N Hochwald; Kfir Ben-David
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-05-02       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Robotic gastric mobilization in robotic minimally invasive esophagectomy.

Authors:  Shigeru Tsunoda; Kazutaka Obama; Tatsuto Nishigori; Shigeo Hisamori; Yoshiharu Sakai
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  Usefulness of robot-assisted thoracoscopic esophagectomy.

Authors:  Yoshiaki Osaka; Shingo Tachibana; Yoshihiro Ota; Takeshi Suda; Yosuke Makuuti; Takafumi Watanabe; Kenichi Iwasaki; Kenji Katsumata; Akihiko Tsuchida
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2018-02-03

7.  Modified exposure method for gastric mobilization in robot-assisted esophagectomy.

Authors:  Yu Zheng; Xi-Wen Zhao; Han-Lu Zhang; Zi-Hao Wang; Yun Wang
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 2.895

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.