Literature DB >> 16795364

The role of proctoring in personalized instruction.

J Farmer1, G D Lachter, J J Blaustein, B K Cole.   

Abstract

The effect of amount of student-proctor interaction was investigated within the framework of Keller's (1968) method of personalized instruction. College students enrolled in introductory psychology were randomly assigned to five groups: 0%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100%, reflecting the percentage of units on which each student was proctored. The results indicated that (a) the proctored students were superior to the non-proctored students as measured by final examination performance, (b) for the proctored groups, the amount of proctoring did not differentially affect final examination performance, and (c) the major effect of increased proctoring was an acceleration of the rate of progress through the course.

Entities:  

Year:  1972        PMID: 16795364      PMCID: PMC1310782          DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1972.5-401

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal        ISSN: 0021-8855


  2 in total

1.  Contingency management in an introductory psychology course produces better learning.

Authors:  J S McMichael; J R Corey
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1969

2.  "Good-bye, teacher...".

Authors:  F S Keller
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1968
  2 in total
  4 in total

1.  PSI: Two unorthodox studies.

Authors:  D A Cook
Journal:  Behav Anal       Date:  1990

2.  Digitek coding and computer analysis of behavior observation data.

Authors:  S N Haynes; J H Wackwitz
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1975

3.  The effects of mastery criteria and assignment length on college student test performance.

Authors:  G Semb
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1974

4.  The effectiveness of currently enrolled student proctors in an undergraduate special education course.

Authors:  J F Gaynor; W D Wolking
Journal:  J Appl Behav Anal       Date:  1974
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.