Literature DB >> 16795047

Mechanical and radiological assessment of the influence of rhTGFbeta-3 on bone regeneration in a segmental defect in the ovine tibia: pilot study.

Otto Maissen1, Christina Eckhardt, Sylwester Gogolewski, Markus Glatt, Tudor Arvinte, Adrian Steiner, Berton Rahn, Urs Schlegel.   

Abstract

Limitations in the use of autologous bone graft, which is the gold standard therapy in bone defect healing, drive the search for alternative treatments. In this study the influence of rhTGFbeta-3 on mechanical and radiological parameters of a healing bone defect in the sheep tibia was assessed. In the sheep, an 18-mm long osteoperiosteal defect in the tibia was treated by rhTGFbeta-3 seeded on a poly(L/DL-lactide) carrier (n = 4). In a second group (n = 4), the defect was treated by the carrier only, in a third group (n = 4) by autologous cancellous bone graft, and in a fourth group (n = 2) the defect remained blank. The healing process of the defect was assessed by weekly in vivo stiffness measurements and radiology as well as by quantitative computed tomographic assessment of bone mineral density (BMD) every 4 weeks. The duration of the experiment was 12 weeks under loading conditions. In the bone graft group, a marginally significant higher increase in stiffness was observed than in the PLA/rhTGFbeta-3 group (p = 0.06) and a significantly higher increase than in the PLA-only group (p = 0.03). The radiographic as well as the computed tomographic evaluation yielded significant differences between the groups (p = 0.03), indicating the bone graft treatment (bone/per area, 83%; BMD, 0.57 g/cm(3)) performing better than the PLA/rhTGFbeta-3 (38%; 0.23 g/cm(3)) and the PLA-only treatment (2.5%; 0.09 g/cm(3)), respectively. Regarding the mechanical and radiological parameters assessed in this study, we conclude that rhTGFbeta-3 has a promoting effect on bone regeneration. However, under the conditions of this study, this effect does not reach the potential of autologous cancellous bone graft transplantation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16795047     DOI: 10.1002/jor.20231

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  8 in total

Review 1.  Scaffold translation: barriers between concept and clinic.

Authors:  Scott J Hollister; William L Murphy
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 6.389

2.  Ovine model for critical-size tibial segmental defects.

Authors:  Chris Christou; Rema A Oliver; Matthew H Pelletier; William R Walsh
Journal:  Comp Med       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 0.982

3.  A preclinical large-animal model for the assessment of critical-size load-bearing bone defect reconstruction.

Authors:  David S Sparks; Siamak Saifzadeh; Flavia Medeiros Savi; Constantin E Dlaska; Arne Berner; Jan Henkel; Johannes C Reichert; Martin Wullschleger; Jiongyu Ren; Amaia Cipitria; Jacqui A McGovern; Roland Steck; Michael Wagels; Maria Ann Woodruff; Michael A Schuetz; Dietmar W Hutmacher
Journal:  Nat Protoc       Date:  2020-02-14       Impact factor: 13.491

Review 4.  Animal models for bone tissue engineering and modelling disease.

Authors:  Jacqui Anne McGovern; Michelle Griffin; Dietmar Werner Hutmacher
Journal:  Dis Model Mech       Date:  2018-04-23       Impact factor: 5.758

Review 5.  Strategies and First Advances in the Development of Prevascularized Bone Implants.

Authors:  Christoph Rücker; Holger Kirch; Oliver Pullig; Heike Walles
Journal:  Curr Mol Biol Rep       Date:  2016-08-15

Review 6.  The Role of Three-Dimensional Scaffolds in Treating Long Bone Defects: Evidence from Preclinical and Clinical Literature-A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Alice Roffi; Gopal Shankar Krishnakumar; Natalia Gostynska; Elizaveta Kon; Christian Candrian; Giuseppe Filardo
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-08-09       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 7.  Bone defect animal models for testing efficacy of bone substitute biomaterials.

Authors:  Ye Li; Shu-Kui Chen; Long Li; Ling Qin; Xin-Luan Wang; Yu-Xiao Lai
Journal:  J Orthop Translat       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 5.191

8.  Large Animal Model of Osteoporotic Defect Healing: An Alternative to Metaphyseal Defect Model.

Authors:  Markus Rupp; Christoph Biehl; Deeksha Malhan; Fathi Hassan; Sameh Attia; Sebastian Rosch; Annemarie B Schäfer; Erin McMahon; Marian Kampschulte; Christian Heiss; Thaqif El Khassawna
Journal:  Life (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-19
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.