Literature DB >> 16794865

Assessing defense structure in school-age children using the Response Evaluation Measure-71-Youth version (REM-Y-71).

Katy B Araujo1, Sanja Medic, Jessica Yasnovsky, Hans Steiner.   

Abstract

This study used the Response Evaluation Measure-Youth (REM-Y-71), a self-report measure of 21 defense reactions, among school-age children. Participants were elementary and middle school students (n = 290; grades 3-8; age range: 8-15; mean = 11.73). Factor analysis revealed a 2-factor defense structure consistent with structure among high school and adult samples. The composite REM-Y defense scores for each factor were significant predictors of social desirability, using the Children's Defensiveness Scale (CDS); anxiety, using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory for Children (STAIC); and psychosocial functioning. This study represents the first cross-sectional empirical analysis of overall defense structure and use among children and early adolescents.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16794865     DOI: 10.1007/s10578-006-0013-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Child Psychiatry Hum Dev        ISSN: 0009-398X


  13 in total

1.  The response evaluation measure (REM-71): a new instrument for the measurement of defenses in adults and adolescents.

Authors:  H Steiner; K B Araujo; C Koopman
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 18.112

2.  The comprehensive assessment of defense style: measuring defense mechanisms in children and adolescents.

Authors:  N Laor; L Wolmer; D V Cicchetti
Journal:  J Nerv Ment Dis       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.254

3.  Validation of the Comprehensive Assessment of Defense Style (CADS): mothers' and children's responses to the stresses of missile attacks.

Authors:  L Wolmer; N Laor; D V Cicchetti
Journal:  J Nerv Ment Dis       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.254

4.  Defense mechanisms and adjustment in normal adolescents.

Authors:  S J Erickson; S S Feldman; H Steiner
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 18.112

5.  Defense mechanisms in adolescents as a function of age, sex, and mental health status.

Authors:  S S Feldman; K B Araujo; H Steiner
Journal:  J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 8.829

6.  Use of the TAT to measure change in defense mechanisms following intensive psychotherapy.

Authors:  P Cramer; S J Blatt
Journal:  J Pers Assess       Date:  1990

7.  Theoretical hierarchy of adaptive ego mechanisms: a 30-year follow-up of 30 men selected for psychological health.

Authors:  G E Vaillant
Journal:  Arch Gen Psychiatry       Date:  1971-02

8.  Preschool antecedents of defense mechanism use in young adults: a longitudinal study.

Authors:  P Cramer; J Block
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1998-01

9.  Two approaches to the measurement of adaptive style: comparison of normal, psychosomatically ill, and delinquent adolescents.

Authors:  H Steiner; S S Feldman
Journal:  J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 8.829

10.  Well-being scales do not measure social desirability.

Authors:  R R McCrae
Journal:  J Gerontol       Date:  1986-05
View more
  2 in total

1.  Relationship between defenses, personality, and affect during a stress task in normal adolescents.

Authors:  Hans Steiner; Sarah J Erickson; Peggy MacLean; Sanja Medic; Belinda Plattner; Cheryl Koopman
Journal:  Child Psychiatry Hum Dev       Date:  2007-03-14

2.  Investigating defensive functioning and alexithymia in substance use disorder patients.

Authors:  Alessandro Taurino; Linda A Antonucci; Paolo Taurisano; Domenico Laera
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2021-07-06       Impact factor: 3.630

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.