Literature DB >> 1679448

An evaluation of the user acceptability of chlorhexidine handwash formulations.

D Scott1, A Barnes, M Lister, P Arkell.   

Abstract

Four similar-looking preparations containing 4% chlorhexidine ('Hibiscrub', Surgiscrub', 'Uniscrub', 'Macrocide') were compared in a single-blind, randomized study in a group of 73 volunteers. The volunteers washed their hands with each preparation ten times over 9 h, one preparation day-1 on each of four days over two weeks. The acceptability of the agents was assessed using visual analogue scales which were analysed by paired t-test. There were marked differences between the products. 'Uniscrub' smelled worse (P less than 0.003) and felt worse than the others (P less than 0.003). 'Hibiscrub' lathered well but 'Macrocide' was found easiest to rinse off. 'Hibiscrub' and 'Surgiscrub' were the least irritant and had the best visual appearance. Despite apparent similarities, these chlorhexidine formulations varied in acceptability to users.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1679448     DOI: 10.1016/0195-6701(91)90263-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hosp Infect        ISSN: 0195-6701            Impact factor:   3.926


  3 in total

Review 1.  Epidemiologic background of hand hygiene and evaluation of the most important agents for scrubs and rubs.

Authors:  Günter Kampf; Axel Kramer
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 26.132

Review 2.  Antiseptic technology: access, affordability, and acceptance.

Authors:  J M Boyce
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 6.883

Review 3.  Surgical hand antisepsis to reduce surgical site infection.

Authors:  Judith Tanner; Jo C Dumville; Gill Norman; Mathew Fortnam
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-01-22
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.