Literature DB >> 16794436

Primary retinal detachment: scleral buckle or pars plana vitrectomy?

Stephen G Schwartz1, Harry W Flynn.   

Abstract

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: There remains no consensus among vitreoretinal surgeons regarding the optimal management of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. In this article, fundamental principles are discussed and applied to recent clinical reports. RECENT
FINDINGS: The consensus of the peer-reviewed literature appears to be that scleral buckling and primary pars plana vitrectomy may yield comparable single-operation success rates and visual acuity outcomes for a wide variety of rhegmatogenous retinal detachments.
SUMMARY: No definitive prospective, randomized, multicenter trial compares scleral buckling with pars plana vitrectomy. The upcoming Scleral Buckling versus Primary Vitrectomy in Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment study may yield useful information in this regard. Even when this study is completed, the choice of surgical modality is complex and may be individualized for specific patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16794436     DOI: 10.1097/01.icu.0000193097.28798.fc

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Ophthalmol        ISSN: 1040-8738            Impact factor:   3.761


  19 in total

1.  Encircling Narrow Band versus Buckle for Retinal Detachments with Intrabasal or Unseen Retinal Breaks.

Authors:  Touka Banaee; Seyedeh Maryam Hosseini; Toktam Helmi; Haleh Ghooshkhanei
Journal:  J Ophthalmic Vis Res       Date:  2015 Jan-Mar

Review 2.  Rhegmatogenous retinal detachment--an ophthalmologic emergency.

Authors:  Nicolas Feltgen; Peter Walter
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2014-01-06       Impact factor: 5.594

3.  Anatomical and functional outcomes of scleral buckling versus primary vitrectomy in pseudophakic retinal detachment.

Authors:  Veysel Cankurtaran; Mehmet Citirik; Mert Simsek; Kemal Tekin; Mehmet Yasin Teke
Journal:  Bosn J Basic Med Sci       Date:  2017-02-21       Impact factor: 3.363

4.  Comparison of four surgical techniques for management of pseudophakic and aphakic retinal detachment: a multicenter clinical trial.

Authors:  Siamak Moradian; Hamid Ahmadieh; Hooshang Faghihi; Alireza Ramezani; Morteza Entezari; Touka Banaee; Ebadollah Heidari; Hassan Behboudi; Mehdi Yasseri
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-03-12       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Cost comparison of scleral buckle versus vitrectomy for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment repair.

Authors:  Michael I Seider; Ayman Naseri; Jay M Stewart
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2013-07-20       Impact factor: 5.258

6.  Surgical repair of primary non-complex rhegmatogenous retinal detachment in the modern era of small-gauge vitrectomy.

Authors:  Omar Moinuddin; Rebhi O Abuzaitoun; Min W Hwang; Sanjana K Sathrasala; Xing D Chen; Joshua D Stein; Mark W Johnson; David N Zacks; Thomas J Wubben; Cagri G Besirli
Journal:  BMJ Open Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-02-25

7.  Pars plana vitrectomy for primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.

Authors:  Stephen G Schwartz; Harry W Flynn
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2008-03

8.  Scleral buckling surgery using multiple radial buckles: A valid option?

Authors:  Aditya Sudhalkar; Anand Sudhalkar
Journal:  Saudi J Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-11-24

9.  Spectral-domain optical coherence tomography imaging of macula-off rhegmatogenous retinal detachment.

Authors:  Jayanth Sridhar; Harry W Flynn
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2014-03-18

10.  Protective Role of 360° Laser Retinopexy in Patients with Rhegmatogenous Retinal Detachment: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Christa Soekamto; Edward R Chu; Daniel A Johnson; Jeong-Hyeon Sohn; Sepehr Bahadorani
Journal:  Korean J Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-06-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.