Literature DB >> 16794121

Variability of repeated coronary artery calcium measurements on low-dose ECG-gated 16-MDCT.

Jun Horiguchi1, Hideya Yamamoto, Nobuhiko Hirai, Yuji Akiyama, Chikako Fujioka, Kazushi Marukawa, Hiroshi Fukuda, Katsuhide Ito.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: High reproducibility on coronary artery calcium (CAC) scoring is a key requirement in monitoring the progression of coronary atherosclerosis. Retrospective ECG-gated helical CT has been shown to be superior to prospective gating helical CT in the reproducibility of CAC measurements. However, it brings with it a high level of radiation exposure. The purpose of this study was to compare low- and standard-dose protocols in the variability of CAC scores and in image quality, thereby assessing the feasibility of low-dose retrospective ECG-gated helical CT in CAC measurements. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Eighty-six patients with CAC were scanned using a tube current setting of 100 mA once and then a tube current setting equivalent to the patient's body weight twice. CAC scores (Agatston and volume) and interscan variability were evaluated. The mean and SD of the CT attenuation values in regions of interest in the aorta were measured, and the value (mean + 2 x SD) was obtained.
RESULTS: A high correlation of log(10) (Agatston score + 1) was observed between sequential helical CT scans (r = 0.998). The variability in CAC measurements ranged from 11% to 12% for both the Agatston and volume scores. With the tube current equivalent to body weight, the value (mean + 2 x SD) did not exceed a CT attenuation value of 130 H.
CONCLUSION: Low-dose retrospective ECG-gated helical CT-yielding low variability and achieving the level of image quality needed to measure CAC-can be used to monitor patients with coronary atherosclerosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16794121     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.05.0052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  6 in total

1.  Coronary artery calcium screening: current status and recommendations from the European Society of Cardiac Radiology and North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging.

Authors:  Matthijs Oudkerk; Arthur E Stillman; Sandra S Halliburton; Willi A Kalender; Stefan Möhlenkamp; Cynthia H McCollough; Rozemarijn Vliegenthart; Leslee J Shaw; William Stanford; Allen J Taylor; Peter M A van Ooijen; Lewis Wexler; Paolo Raggi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2008-07-24       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Coronary calcium score from multislice computed tomography correlates with QT dispersion and left ventricular wall thickness.

Authors:  Nan-Hung Pan; Hung-Yu Yang; Ming-Hsiung Hsieh; Yi-Jen Chen
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2008-05-17       Impact factor: 2.037

3.  The impact of motion artifacts on the reproducibility of repeated coronary artery calcium measurements.

Authors:  Jun Horiguchi; Hiroshi Fukuda; Hideya Yamamoto; Nobuhiko Hirai; Farzana Alam; Hideaki Kakizawa; Masashi Hieda; Toshihiro Tachikake; Kazushi Marukawa; Katsuhide Ito
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-05-23       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Radiation dose values for various coronary calcium scoring protocols in dual-source CT.

Authors:  Paul Stolzmann; Sebastian Leschka; Thomas Betschart; Lotus Desbiolles; Thomas G Flohr; Borut Marincek; Hatem Alkadhi
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2008-12-12       Impact factor: 2.357

5.  Calcium scoring using 64-slice MDCT, dual source CT and EBT: a comparative phantom study.

Authors:  Jaap M Groen; Marcel J W Greuter; R Vliegenthart; C Suess; B Schmidt; F Zijlstra; M Oudkerk
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2007-11-23       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 6.  Coronary artery calcium screening: current status and recommendations from the European Society of Cardiac Radiology and North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging.

Authors:  Matthijs Oudkerk; Arthur E Stillman; Sandra S Halliburton; Willi A Kalender; Stefan Möhlenkamp; Cynthia H McCollough; Rozemarijn Vliegenthart; Leslee J Shaw; William Stanford; Allen J Taylor; Peter M A van Ooijen; Lewis Wexler; Paolo Raggi
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2008-05-27       Impact factor: 2.357

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.