Literature DB >> 16793858

Olfactory sensitivity for enantiomers and their racemic mixtures--a comparative study in CD-1 mice and spider monkeys.

Dipa Joshi1, Michaela Völkl, Gordon M Shepherd, Matthias Laska.   

Abstract

Using a conditioning paradigm, the olfactory sensitivity of six CD-1 mice for the enantiomers of carvone and of limonene as well as for their racemic mixtures was investigated. With all six stimuli, the animals significantly discriminated concentrations <or=0.1 ppm (parts per million) from the odorless solvent, and with five of the six stimuli, the best-scoring animals were even able to detect concentrations <or=1 ppb (parts per billion). Five spider monkeys tested in parallel were found to detect the same stimuli at concentrations <1 ppm, and with two of the stimuli, they were also able to discriminate concentrations <1 ppb from the solvent. The results showed 1) both CD-1 mice and spider monkeys to have a well-developed olfactory sensitivity for the stimuli tested, with no systematic difference in performance between species; 2) the effect of chirality on detectability of the enantiomers to be substance specific; 3) no systematic effect of the presence (carvone) or absence (limonene) of a functional carbonyl group on detectability of the enantiomers; and 4) that spider monkeys detected the racemic mixtures of both carvone and limonene at lower concentrations compared to the unmixed compounds, whereas the mice failed to do so. These findings lend support to the growing body of evidence suggesting that between-species comparisons of the relative size of olfactory brain structures do not allow us to reliably predict olfactory sensitivity. As mice and spider monkeys are thought to share a similar number of functional olfactory receptor genes, the findings further suggest that differences in the relative abundance of chiral-specific olfactory receptor types might account for the observed difference in mixture additivity at threshold level between the two species. These threshold data may provide useful information for the choice of adequate stimulus concentrations in electrophysiological or imaging studies of the olfactory system or investigations of the discriminative abilities of mice and spider monkeys.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16793858     DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bjl006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chem Senses        ISSN: 0379-864X            Impact factor:   3.160


  13 in total

1.  Olfactory discrimination ability of CD-1 mice for aliphatic aldehydes as a function of stimulus concentration.

Authors:  Matthias Laska; Dipa Joshi; Gordon M Shepherd
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2007-06-20       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Olfactory discrimination of aliphatic odorants at 1 ppm: too easy for CD-1 mice to show odor structure-activity relationships?

Authors:  Matthias Laska; Asa Rosandher; Sara Hommen
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2008-09-23       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Olfactory discrimination ability of CD-1 mice for a large array of enantiomers.

Authors:  M Laska; G M Shepherd
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2006-10-11       Impact factor: 3.590

4.  Structural determinants of a conserved enantiomer-selective carvone binding pocket in the human odorant receptor OR1A1.

Authors:  Christiane Geithe; Jonas Protze; Franziska Kreuchwig; Gerd Krause; Dietmar Krautwurst
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 9.261

5.  Olfactory sensitivity for sperm-attractant aromatic aldehydes: a comparative study in human subjects and spider monkeys.

Authors:  Luna Kjeldmand; Laura Teresa Hernandez Salazar; Matthias Laska
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-09-07       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Odor coding by a Mammalian receptor repertoire.

Authors:  Harumi Saito; Qiuyi Chi; Hanyi Zhuang; Hiroaki Matsunami; Joel D Mainland
Journal:  Sci Signal       Date:  2009-03-03       Impact factor: 8.192

7.  Olfactory sensitivity and odor structure-activity relationships for aliphatic carboxylic acids in CD-1 mice.

Authors:  Selçuk Can Güven; Matthias Laska
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Olfactory and visuospatial learning and memory performance in two strains of Alzheimer's disease model mice--a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Matthew Phillips; Erik Boman; Hanna Osterman; David Willhite; Matthias Laska
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-05-05       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  An odor detection system based on automatically trained mice by relative go no-go olfactory operant conditioning.

Authors:  Jing He; JingKuan Wei; Joshua D Rizak; YanMei Chen; JianHong Wang; XinTian Hu; YuanYe Ma
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Genetic elucidation of human hyperosmia to isovaleric acid.

Authors:  Idan Menashe; Tatjana Abaffy; Yehudit Hasin; Sivan Goshen; Vered Yahalom; Charles W Luetje; Doron Lancet
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2007-10-30       Impact factor: 8.029

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.