Literature DB >> 16793405

Techniques for gamma-H2AX detection.

Asako Nakamura1, Olga A Sedelnikova, Christophe Redon, Duane R Pilch, Natasha I Sinogeeva, Robert Shroff, Michael Lichten, William M Bonner.   

Abstract

When a double-strand break (DSB) forms in DNA, many molecules of histone H2AX present in the chromatin flanking the break site are rapidly phosphorylated. The phosphorylated derivative of H2AX is named gamma-H2AX, and the phosphorylation site is a conserved serine four residues from the C-terminus, 139 in mammals and 129 in budding yeast. An antibody to gamma-H2AX reveals that the molecules form a gamma-focus at the DSB site. The gamma-focus increases in size rapidly for 10-30 min after formation, and remains until the break is repaired. Studies have revealed that small numbers of gamma-foci are present in cells even without the purposeful introduction of DNA DSBs. These cryptogenic foci increase in number during senescence in culture and aging in mice. This chapter presents techniques for revealing gamma-H2AX foci in cultured cells, in metaphase spreads from cultured cells, in tissues, and in yeast.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16793405     DOI: 10.1016/S0076-6879(05)09014-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods Enzymol        ISSN: 0076-6879            Impact factor:   1.600


  36 in total

1.  Development of a validated immunofluorescence assay for γH2AX as a pharmacodynamic marker of topoisomerase I inhibitor activity.

Authors:  Robert J Kinders; Melinda Hollingshead; Scott Lawrence; Jiuping Ji; Brian Tabb; William M Bonner; Yves Pommier; Larry Rubinstein; Yvonne A Evrard; Ralph E Parchment; Joseph Tomaszewski; James H Doroshow
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2010-10-05       Impact factor: 12.531

2.  Homologous chromosomes make contact at the sites of double-strand breaks in genes in somatic G0/G1-phase human cells.

Authors:  Manoj Gandhi; Viktoria N Evdokimova; Karen T Cuenco; Marina N Nikiforova; Lindsey M Kelly; James R Stringer; Christopher J Bakkenist; Yuri E Nikiforov
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Radiation signature on exposed cells: Relevance in dose estimation.

Authors:  Venkatachalam Perumal; Tamizh Selvan Gnana Sekaran; Venkateswarlu Raavi; Safa Abdul Syed Basheerudeen; Karthik Kanagaraj; Amith Roy Chowdhury; Solomon Fd Paul
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2015-09-28

Review 4.  Cytometry of ATM activation and histone H2AX phosphorylation to estimate extent of DNA damage induced by exogenous agents.

Authors:  Toshiki Tanaka; Xuan Huang; H Dorota Halicka; Hong Zhao; Frank Traganos; Anthony P Albino; Wei Dai; Zbigniew Darzynkiewicz
Journal:  Cytometry A       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 4.355

5.  DNA damage response and apoptosis.

Authors:  Dragos Plesca; Suparna Mazumder; Alexandru Almasan
Journal:  Methods Enzymol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 1.600

6.  Repair characteristics and time-dependent effects in Saccharomyces cerevisiae cells after X-ray irradiation.

Authors:  Xiaopeng Guo; Miaomiao Zhang; Ruiyuan Liu; Yue Gao; Yang Yang; Wenjian Li; Dong Lu
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2018-12-10       Impact factor: 3.312

7.  Protein phosphatase 5 regulates the function of 53BP1 after neocarzinostatin-induced DNA damage.

Authors:  Yoonsung Kang; Jung-Hee Lee; Nguyen Ngoc Hoan; Hong-Moon Sohn; In-Youb Chang; Ho Jin You
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2009-01-28       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 8.  Impaired DNA damage response--an Achilles' heel sensitizing cancer to chemotherapy and radiotherapy.

Authors:  Zbigniew Darzynkiewicz; Frank Traganos; Donald Wlodkowic
Journal:  Eur J Pharmacol       Date:  2009-10-18       Impact factor: 4.432

9.  Telomere-dependent and telomere-independent origins of endogenous DNA damage in tumor cells.

Authors:  Asako J Nakamura; Christophe E Redon; William M Bonner; Olga A Sedelnikova
Journal:  Aging (Albany NY)       Date:  2009-02-04       Impact factor: 5.682

10.  A truncated DNA-damage-signaling response is activated after DSB formation in the G1 phase of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Ryan Janke; Kristina Herzberg; Michael Rolfsmeier; Jordan Mar; Vladimir I Bashkirov; Edwin Haghnazari; Greg Cantin; John R Yates; Wolf-Dietrich Heyer
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-01-08       Impact factor: 16.971

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.