J Ty Hopkins1. 1. Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602-2205, USA. tyhopkins@byu.edu
Abstract
CONTEXT: Cryotherapy has been shown to disinhibit the quadriceps muscle after joint effusion by a resting measure (Hoffmann reflex) of motor recruitment. I sought to determine whether cryotherapy-induced motor recruitment changes resulted in subsequent changes in functional movement. OBJECTIVE: To quantify muscle recruitment changes and knee joint function after joint effusion and subsequent joint cryotherapy. DESIGN: A 3 x 4 multivariate mixed-model design was used to compare groups (normative, effusion/control, effusion/cryotherapy) across time (preinjection, postinjection, 30 minutes postinjection, and 60 minutes postinjection). SETTING: Human performance laboratory. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: Forty-five volunteers (26 males, 19 females; age = 21 +/- 2 years, height = 174.8 +/- 10.2 cm, mass = 78.1 +/- 15.4 kg). INTERVENTION(S): Experimental joint effusion was used to elicit inhibition of the quadriceps muscle. Cryotherapy was a treatment intervention. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Lower chain peak joint torque, peak and average power, knee anterior joint reaction force, and average and peak vastus medialis, vastus lateralis, medial hamstrings, and gastrocnemius muscle normalized electromyographic activity were collected during the extension phase of a seated, recumbent stepping motion with a resistance of 36% of 1-repetition maximum and a controlled cadence of 1.5 Hz. RESULTS: Decreases in peak torque and peak power were observed after effusion, whereas no decrease was observed over time in the cryotherapy or normative groups. A decrease in peak vastus lateralis activity was also noted after effusion relative to other groups. Also, the effusion/cryotherapy group had a greater knee anterior joint reaction force relative to the effusion/control and normative groups after effusion. CONCLUSIONS: Joint cryotherapy negated movement deficiencies represented by knee peak torque and power decreases. This could be due to facilitated vastus lateralis activation relative to other groups.
CONTEXT: Cryotherapy has been shown to disinhibit the quadriceps muscle after joint effusion by a resting measure (Hoffmann reflex) of motor recruitment. I sought to determine whether cryotherapy-induced motor recruitment changes resulted in subsequent changes in functional movement. OBJECTIVE: To quantify muscle recruitment changes and knee joint function after joint effusion and subsequent joint cryotherapy. DESIGN: A 3 x 4 multivariate mixed-model design was used to compare groups (normative, effusion/control, effusion/cryotherapy) across time (preinjection, postinjection, 30 minutes postinjection, and 60 minutes postinjection). SETTING:Human performance laboratory. PATIENTS OR OTHER PARTICIPANTS: Forty-five volunteers (26 males, 19 females; age = 21 +/- 2 years, height = 174.8 +/- 10.2 cm, mass = 78.1 +/- 15.4 kg). INTERVENTION(S): Experimental joint effusion was used to elicit inhibition of the quadriceps muscle. Cryotherapy was a treatment intervention. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Lower chain peak joint torque, peak and average power, knee anterior joint reaction force, and average and peak vastus medialis, vastus lateralis, medial hamstrings, and gastrocnemius muscle normalized electromyographic activity were collected during the extension phase of a seated, recumbent stepping motion with a resistance of 36% of 1-repetition maximum and a controlled cadence of 1.5 Hz. RESULTS: Decreases in peak torque and peak power were observed after effusion, whereas no decrease was observed over time in the cryotherapy or normative groups. A decrease in peak vastus lateralis activity was also noted after effusion relative to other groups. Also, the effusion/cryotherapy group had a greater knee anterior joint reaction force relative to the effusion/control and normative groups after effusion. CONCLUSIONS: Joint cryotherapy negated movement deficiencies represented by knee peak torque and power decreases. This could be due to facilitated vastus lateralis activation relative to other groups.
Authors: Riann M Palmieri; James A Tom; Jeffery E Edwards; Arthur Weltman; Ethan N Saliba; Danny J Mistry; Christopher D Ingersoll Journal: J Electromyogr Kinesiol Date: 2004-12 Impact factor: 2.368
Authors: Riann M Palmieri; Arthur Weltman; Jeffrey E Edwards; James A Tom; Ethan N Saliba; Danny J Mistry; Christopher D Ingersoll Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2005-02-01 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Christopher M Kuenze; Jay Hertel; Arthur Weltman; David Diduch; Susan A Saliba; Joseph M Hart Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2015-01-26 Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: Adam S Lepley; Nael O Bahhur; Amanda M Murray; Brian G Pietrosimone Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2013-12-11 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Isabel A C Baert; Filip Staes; Steven Truijen; Armaghan Mahmoudian; Nathalie Noppe; Geert Vanderschueren; Frank P Luyten; Sabine M P Verschueren Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2013-02-02 Impact factor: 4.342