Literature DB >> 16787852

Transmission of Campylobacter spp. in a poultry slaughterhouse and genetic characterisation of the isolates by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.

J Posch1, G Feierl, G Wuest, W Sixl, S Schmidt, Du Haas, F F Reinthaler, E Marth.   

Abstract

1. Contamination of retail products with Campylobacter spp. during the slaughter of poultry is a well-known problem of product hygiene. Mechanical evisceration often leads to intestinal rupture and discharge of gut contents, which can contain zoonotic and human pathogens. Processes along the slaughter line cause aerosols and airborne droplets, containing bacterial loads. 2. To estimate the possible transmission routes of intestinal Campylobacter, 36 measurements of the bioaerosol (Andersen sampler and SKC BioSampler), 30 cloacal (of three flocks), 10 equipment and 4 sedimentation samples were tested for the presence of Campylobacter species. 3. The results imply that, in addition to contaminated equipment, which was Campylobacter-positive in 80% of cases, aerosols with peak values of 4.0 x 10(4) (test series 1) and 1.4 x 10(4) (test series 2) CFU/m3 also provide a potential vector for horizontal transmission. 4. To explore the genetic similarities of isolates from different origins, 18 isolates recovered from air, 26 cloacal, 8 equipment and 4 sedimentation isolates were analysed by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE), using the restriction enzymes Sma I and Sal I. The similarity of cloacal isolates with isolates from equipment, air and sediment, suggest that the contamination is of intestinal origin. 5. There were direct links between Campylobacter-positive flocks and the presence of the same strains in the aerosol of the slaughter hall. Air as a potential source for microbial transmission must be taken into account.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16787852     DOI: 10.1080/00071660600753763

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Poult Sci        ISSN: 0007-1668            Impact factor:   2.095


  8 in total

1.  Prevalence, seasonality, and antimicrobial resistance of thermotolerant Campylobacter isolated from broiler farms and slaughterhouses in East Algeria.

Authors:  Mohamed Baali; Mohamed Lounis; Hanan Laidouci Al Amir; Ammar Ayachi; Ahcen Hakem; Ahmed Kassah-Laouar
Journal:  Vet World       Date:  2020-06-28

2.  Comparison of Campylobacter populations isolated from a free-range broiler flock before and after slaughter.

Authors:  Frances M Colles; Noel D McCarthy; Samuel K Sheppard; Ruth Layton; Martin C J Maiden
Journal:  Int J Food Microbiol       Date:  2010-01-04       Impact factor: 5.277

3.  Characterization and deposition of respirable large- and small-particle bioaerosols.

Authors:  Richard J Thomas; Daniel Webber; William Sellors; Aaron Collinge; Andrew Frost; Anthony J Stagg; Stephen C Bailey; Pramukh N Jayasekera; Rosa R Taylor; Steve Eley; Richard W Titball
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2008-08-22       Impact factor: 4.792

4.  Campylobacter genotypes from poultry transportation crates indicate a source of contamination and transmission.

Authors:  R Hastings; F M Colles; N D McCarthy; M C J Maiden; S K Sheppard
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2010-11-09       Impact factor: 3.772

Review 5.  Mobile Poultry Processing Unit as a Resource for Small Poultry Farms: Planning and Economic Efficiency, Animal Welfare, Meat Quality and Sanitary Implications.

Authors:  Alice Cartoni Mancinelli; Alessandro Dal Bosco; Simona Mattioli; David Ranucci; Cesare Castellini
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 6.  Review of Antibiotic Resistance, Ecology, Dissemination, and Mitigation in U.S. Broiler Poultry Systems.

Authors:  Yichao Yang; Amanda J Ashworth; Cammy Willett; Kimberly Cook; Abhinav Upadhyay; Phillip R Owens; Steven C Ricke; Jennifer M DeBruyn; Philip A Moore
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 5.640

7.  Multidrug-Resistant Campylobacer jejuni on Swine Processing at a Slaughterhouse in Eastern Spain.

Authors:  Clara Marin; Laura Lorenzo-Rebenaque; Judith Moreno-Moliner; Sandra Sevilla-Navarro; Estefania Montero; Mᵃ Carmen Chinillac; Jaume Jordá; Santiago Vega
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-08       Impact factor: 2.752

8.  A longitudinal study of Campylobacter distribution in a turkey production chain.

Authors:  Päivikki Perko-Mäkelä; Pauliina Isohanni; Marianne Katzav; Marianne Lund; Marja-Liisa Hänninen; Ulrike Lyhs
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 1.695

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.