AIM: The aim of this study was to compare proprioceptive function between computerized proprioception facilitation exercise (CPFE) and closed kinetic chain exercise (CKCE) for knee osteoarthritis. DESIGN: Randomized-controlled. SETTING: Kinesiology laboratory. PATIENTS: Eighty-one patients with bilateral knee osteoarthritis were randomly assigned to CPFE, CKCE, and control groups. INTERVENTION: Both exercise groups underwent an 8-week program of three sessions per week. The control group received no training. The CPFE program included a 20-min computer game to be played by the trained foot of the subject. CKCE included 10 sets of 10 repetitions of repeated knee extension and flexion with resistance of 10-25% of body weight. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Absolute reposition error, functional score, walking speed, and knee muscle strength were assessed with an electrogoniometer, the physical function subscale of Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index, a CASIO stopwatch, and a Cybex 6000 dynamometer before and after the 8-week period. RESULTS: The results of this study showed that both CPFE and CKCE were effective in improving joint position sense, functional score, walking speed, and muscle strength. Furthermore, CKCE showed greater effect in increasing knee extensor torque in patients with knee osteoarthritis. CONCLUSION: Clinical effects of CPFE were the same as those of CKCE except for knee extensor torque. The increase in knee extensor torque in CPFE patients was not as great as that seen in CKCE patients.
RCT Entities:
AIM: The aim of this study was to compare proprioceptive function between computerized proprioception facilitation exercise (CPFE) and closed kinetic chain exercise (CKCE) for knee osteoarthritis. DESIGN: Randomized-controlled. SETTING: Kinesiology laboratory. PATIENTS: Eighty-one patients with bilateral knee osteoarthritis were randomly assigned to CPFE, CKCE, and control groups. INTERVENTION: Both exercise groups underwent an 8-week program of three sessions per week. The control group received no training. The CPFE program included a 20-min computer game to be played by the trained foot of the subject. CKCE included 10 sets of 10 repetitions of repeated knee extension and flexion with resistance of 10-25% of body weight. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Absolute reposition error, functional score, walking speed, and knee muscle strength were assessed with an electrogoniometer, the physical function subscale of Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index, a CASIO stopwatch, and a Cybex 6000 dynamometer before and after the 8-week period. RESULTS: The results of this study showed that both CPFE and CKCE were effective in improving joint position sense, functional score, walking speed, and muscle strength. Furthermore, CKCE showed greater effect in increasing knee extensor torque in patients with knee osteoarthritis. CONCLUSION: Clinical effects of CPFE were the same as those of CKCE except for knee extensor torque. The increase in knee extensor torque in CPFEpatients was not as great as that seen in CKCEpatients.
Authors: Brian A Primack; Mary V Carroll; Megan McNamara; Mary Lou Klem; Brandy King; Michael Rich; Chun W Chan; Smita Nayak Journal: Am J Prev Med Date: 2012-06 Impact factor: 5.043
Authors: Doris Vahtrik; Helena Gapeyeva; Herje Aibast; Jaan Ereline; Tatjana Kums; Tiit Haviko; Aare Märtson; Galina Schneider; Mati Pääsuke Journal: Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Date: 2011-12-03 Impact factor: 4.342
Authors: Amber T Collins; J Troy Blackburn; Chris W Olcott; Douglas R Dirschl; Paul S Weinhold Journal: J Orthop Surg Res Date: 2009-02-02 Impact factor: 2.359