Literature DB >> 16785722

Positive and negative predictive values of BI-RADS-MRI descriptors for focal breast masses.

Mitsuhiro Tozaki1, Takao Igarashi, Kunihiko Fukuda.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purposes of this study were to evaluate the positive and negative predictive values of the BI-RADS-MR descriptors of focal masses and to develop an interpretation model based on the kinetic and morphologic parameters.
METHODS: Retrospective review was performed of 171 consecutive focal breast masses. MR imaging was performed on a 1.5T system using the volumetric interpolated breath-hold examination sequence (mean partition thickness, 1.2 mm; time of acquisition, 35 s). Kinetic enhancement patterns were assessed by visually comparing signal intensity on the dynamic images acquired at 60 s and 4 min (washout, plateau, and persistent).
RESULTS: There were 126 malignant and 45 benign lesions. The most frequent morphological finding among the malignant lesions was heterogeneous internal enhancement in the delayed phase (96%; P<0.001); the most frequent finding in benign lesions was smooth margin or smooth shape/margin (80 to 82%; P<0.001). The features with the highest positive predictive value for carcinoma were spiculated margin (100%), delayed central enhancement (100%), delayed enhancing internal septations (97%), and irregular shape (97%). The characteristics with the highest diagnostic accuracy for malignancy were spiculated margin (100%) and heterogeneous enhancement following washout in the smooth shape/margin group (100%). The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values of an interpretation model based on a combination of the morphologic characteristics and kinetic information were 99%, 89%, 96%, and 98%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: A combination of morphologic criteria, particularly lesion shape/margin and internal heterogeneity, and kinetic information is useful for differentiating benign and malignant lesions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16785722     DOI: 10.2463/mrms.5.7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med Sci        ISSN: 1347-3182            Impact factor:   2.471


  13 in total

1.  The clinical value of bilateral breast MR imaging: is it worth performing on patients showing suspicious microcalcifications on mammography?

Authors:  Ayano Akita; Akihiro Tanimoto; Hiromitsu Jinno; Kaori Kameyama; Sachio Kuribayashi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-04-07       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Can we apply the MRI BI-RADS lexicon morphology descriptors on contrast-enhanced spectral mammography?

Authors:  Rasha M Kamal; Maha H Helal; Sahar M Mansour; Marwa A Haggag; Omniya M Nada; Iman G Farahat; Nelly H Alieldin
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2016-06-21       Impact factor: 3.039

3.  Multimodality imaging features of idiopathic granulomatous mastitis: outcome of 12 years of experience.

Authors:  M Dursun; S Yilmaz; A Yahyayev; A Salmaslioglu; E Yavuz; A Igci; G Acunas; M Tunacı
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2011-10-21       Impact factor: 3.469

4.  Association between dynamic contrast enhanced MRI imaging features and WHO histopathological grade in patients with invasive ductal breast cancer.

Authors:  Juan Huang; Jianqun Yu; Yulan Peng
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 2.967

5.  Diagnostic performance of initial enhancement analysis using ultra-fast dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for breast lesions.

Authors:  Mariko Goto; Koji Sakai; Hajime Yokota; Maki Kiba; Mariko Yoshida; Hiroshi Imai; Elisabeth Weiland; Isao Yokota; Kei Yamada
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-08-07       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Positive predictive value of BI-RADS MR imaging.

Authors:  Mary C Mahoney; Constantine Gatsonis; Lucy Hanna; Wendy B DeMartini; Constance Lehman
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Significance of breast lesion descriptors in the ACR BI-RADS MRI lexicon.

Authors:  Garima Agrawal; Min-Ying Su; Orhan Nalcioglu; Stephen A Feig; Jeon-Hor Chen
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2009-04-01       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Value of the BI-RADS classification in MR-Mammography for diagnosis of benign and malignant breast tumors.

Authors:  Christian Sohns; Martin Scherrer; Wieland Staab; Silvia Obenauer
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-07-31       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging Features of Idiopathic Granulomatous Mastitis: A Retrospective Analysis.

Authors:  Necdet Poyraz; Ganime Dilek Emlik; Abdussamet Batur; Ebubekir Gundes; Suat Keskin
Journal:  Iran J Radiol       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 0.212

10.  Predictive performance of BI-RADS magnetic resonance imaging descriptors in the context of suspicious (category 4) findings.

Authors:  João Ricardo Maltez de Almeida; André Boechat Gomes; Thomas Pitangueiras Barros; Paulo Eduardo Fahel; Mário de Seixas Rocha
Journal:  Radiol Bras       Date:  2016 May-Jun
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.