Literature DB >> 16785257

The acquisition of spatial constructions in American sign language and English.

Amber Joy Martin1, Maria D Sera.   

Abstract

Spatial relations in American Sign Language (ASL) are often signed from the perspective of the signer and so involve a shift in perspective and mental rotation. This study examined developing knowledge of language used to refer to the spatial relations front, behind, left, right, towards, away, above, and below by children learning ASL and English. Because ASL is a classifier language in which noun referents are placed into groups, each spatial relation also appeared with person, animal, and vehicle classifiers. Twenty-three children and adults who learned ASL before the age of 5 years and 23 native English-speaking adults and children participated. Both language groups participated in a comprehension task in which they chose which of 2 pictures depicted a signed or spoken relation. Results showed that children learning ASL acquired the constructions for spatial relations that typically involve perspective shifts and mental rotation later than constructions that do not involve these abilities and later than English-speaking children. Children learning ASL did not differ from English-speaking children in learning constructions that did not involve these abilities. Results also suggest that users of ASL initially comprehend spatial relations more accurately with person and animal classifiers than with the classifier for vehicles. The results are relevant to understanding the acquisition of spatial relations in ASL.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16785257     DOI: 10.1093/deafed/enl004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ        ISSN: 1081-4159


  6 in total

1.  Assessing the Comprehension of Spatial Perspectives in ASL Classifier Constructions.

Authors:  Chris Brozdowski; Kristen Secora; Karen Emmorey
Journal:  J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ       Date:  2019-07-01

2.  Differential neural activity patterns for spatial relations in humans: a MEG study.

Authors:  Nicole M Scott; Arthur Leuthold; Maria D Sera; Apostolos P Georgopoulos
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Cortical plasticity for visuospatial processing and object recognition in deaf and hearing signers.

Authors:  Jill Weisberg; Daniel S Koo; Kelly L Crain; Guinevere F Eden
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 6.556

4.  Visual-Spatial Perspective-Taking in Spatial Scenes and in American Sign Language.

Authors:  Kristen Secora; Karen Emmorey
Journal:  J Deaf Stud Deaf Educ       Date:  2020-09-10

5.  Late sign language exposure does not modulate the relation between spatial language and spatial memory in deaf children and adults.

Authors:  Dilay Z Karadöller; Beyza Sümer; Ercenur Ünal; Aslı Özyürek
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2022-03-17

6.  An information theory analysis of spatial decisions in cognitive development.

Authors:  Nicole M Scott; Maria D Sera; Apostolos P Georgopoulos
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 4.677

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.