Literature DB >> 35301680

Late sign language exposure does not modulate the relation between spatial language and spatial memory in deaf children and adults.

Dilay Z Karadöller1,2, Beyza Sümer3,4, Ercenur Ünal5, Aslı Özyürek3,6,7.   

Abstract

Prior work with hearing children acquiring a spoken language as their first language shows that spatial language and cognition are related systems and spatial language use predicts spatial memory. Here, we further investigate the extent of this relationship in signing deaf children and adults and ask if late sign language exposure, as well as the frequency and the type of spatial language use that might be affected by late exposure, modulate subsequent memory for spatial relations. To do so, we compared spatial language and memory of 8-year-old late-signing children (after 2 years of exposure to a sign language at the school for the deaf) and late-signing adults to their native-signing counterparts. We elicited picture descriptions of Left-Right relations in Turkish Sign Language (Türk İşaret Dili) and measured the subsequent recognition memory accuracy of the described pictures. Results showed that late-signing adults and children were similar to their native-signing counterparts in how often they encoded the spatial relation. However, late-signing adults but not children differed from their native-signing counterparts in the type of spatial language they used. However, neither late sign language exposure nor the frequency and type of spatial language use modulated spatial memory accuracy. Therefore, even though late language exposure seems to influence the type of spatial language use, this does not predict subsequent memory for spatial relations. We discuss the implications of these findings based on the theories concerning the correspondence between spatial language and cognition as related or rather independent systems.
© 2022. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Language and cognition; Sign language acquisition; Spatial language; Spatial memory

Year:  2022        PMID: 35301680     DOI: 10.3758/s13421-022-01281-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  18 in total

1.  Iconicity in spatial language guides visual attention: A comparison between signers' and speakers' eye gaze during message preparation.

Authors:  Francie Manhardt; Aslı Özyürek; Beyza Sümer; Kimberley Mulder; Dilay Z Karadöller; Susanne Brouwer
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2020-04-30       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Relational language and the development of relational mapping.

Authors:  Jeffrey Loewenstein; Dedre Gentner
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2005-01-11       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  More than meets the eye: the role of language in binding and maintaining feature conjunctions.

Authors:  Banchiamlack Dessalegn; Barbara Landau
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2008-02

4.  Interactive contexts increase informativeness in children's referential communication.

Authors:  Myrto Grigoroglou; Anna Papafragou
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  2019-02-11

5.  Update on "What" and "Where" in Spatial Language: A New Division of Labor for Spatial Terms.

Authors:  Barbara Landau
Journal:  Cogn Sci       Date:  2016-09-16

6.  Language, space, and the development of cognitive flexibility in humans: the case of two spatial memory tasks.

Authors:  L Hermer-Vazquez; A Moffet; P Munkholm
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2001-05

7.  Spatial language facilitates spatial cognition: evidence from children who lack language input.

Authors:  Dedre Gentner; Asli Ozyürek; Ozge Gürcanli; Susan Goldin-Meadow
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2013-03-28

8.  Spatial and numerical abilities without a complete natural language.

Authors:  Daniel C Hyde; Nathan Winkler-Rhoades; Sang-Ah Lee; Veronique Izard; Kevin A Shapiro; Elizabeth S Spelke
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2010-12-17       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Turning the tables: language and spatial reasoning.

Authors:  Peggy Li; Lila Gleitman
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2002-04

10.  Integration of communicative partner's visual perspective in patterns of referential requests.

Authors:  Sevda Bahtiyar; Aylin C Küntay
Journal:  J Child Lang       Date:  2008-10-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.