Literature DB >> 16784083

Failure modes of the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial bioprosthesis in the aortic position.

Eric E Roselli1, Nicholas G Smedira, Eugene H Blackstone.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM OF THE STUDY: Modes of failure of the Perimount bioprostheses have not been characterized. Thus, the study aim was to classify their failure modes, to compare their rates of occurrence, and to relate these to patient age.
METHODS: Between September 1981 and July 1985, a total of 478 patients received Carpentier-Edwards Perimount aortic valve prostheses as part of a premarket approval cohort. During yearly follow up over 19 years, 95 prostheses were explanted, 70 (74%) for reasons of structural valve deterioration (SVD). Preoperative diagnostic studies, echocardiograms, operative notes and pathology reports were reviewed to classify the primary modes of failure. Hazard function methodology established mode-specific occurrence rates and how these were modulated by patient age at implant.
RESULTS: The pathophysiology of SVD was pure regurgitation in 23 cases, pure stenosis in 18, mixed in 20, and uncertain in nine. Primary modes of failure were calcification (n = 27; 39%), non-calcific degeneration (n = 21; 30%), fibrosis (n = 5; 7.1%), dehiscence (n = 4; 5.7%), a combination of these (n = 10; 14%), or unknown (n = 3; 4.3%). The failure rate for each mode accelerated with time, was highest and almost equal for calcification and degeneration, and was slower and almost equal for fibrosis and dehiscence. Except for dehiscence, failure modes were age-dependent (p < 0.05), and this was most prominent for degeneration and calcification.
CONCLUSION: Perimount bioprostheses rarely fail from design-related causes; rather, they fail at almost equal rates from calcific and non-calcific degeneration, both of which occur late and are age-dependent. Further investigation into improved methods for fixation and anti-calcification in preparing these valves is warranted.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16784083

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Heart Valve Dis        ISSN: 0966-8519


  7 in total

1.  Long-term durability of bioprosthetic aortic valves: implications from 12,569 implants.

Authors:  Douglas R Johnston; Edward G Soltesz; Nakul Vakil; Jeevanantham Rajeswaran; Eric E Roselli; Joseph F Sabik; Nicholas G Smedira; Lars G Svensson; Bruce W Lytle; Eugene H Blackstone
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 4.330

2.  Early structural degeneration of Mitroflow aortic valve: another issue in addition to the mismatch?

Authors:  Giovanni Ruvolo; Calogera Pisano; Carmela Rita Balistreri; Emiliano Maresi; Oreste Fabio Triolo; Vincenzo Argano; Carlo Bassano; Sara Rita Vacirca; Paolo Nardi; Augusto Orlandi
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 3.  TAVR Vs. SAVR in Intermediate-Risk Patients: What Influences Our Choice of Therapy.

Authors:  Sasha Still; Molly Szerlip; Michael Mack
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 2.931

4.  Calcification and Oxidative Modifications Are Associated With Progressive Bioprosthetic Heart Valve Dysfunction.

Authors:  Suengwon Lee; Robert J Levy; Abigail J Christian; Stanley L Hazen; Nathan E Frick; Eric K Lai; Juan B Grau; Joseph E Bavaria; Giovanni Ferrari
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2017-05-08       Impact factor: 5.501

5.  Noncalcific Mechanisms of Bioprosthetic Structural Valve Degeneration.

Authors:  Matteo Marro; Alexander P Kossar; Yingfei Xue; Antonio Frasca; Robert J Levy; Giovanni Ferrari
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2021-01-26       Impact factor: 5.501

6.  Commentary: Lasting durable bioprosthetic valves: Truth or fiction.

Authors:  Ahmed Alnajar; Walid Ibrahim; Abdelmotagaly Elgalad; Joseph Lamelas
Journal:  JTCVS Open       Date:  2022-01-20

7.  Long-term durability of a new surgical aortic valve: A 1 billion cycle in vitro study.

Authors:  Vahid Sadri; Phillip M Trusty; Immanuel David Madukauwa-David; Ajit P Yoganathan
Journal:  JTCVS Open       Date:  2021-11-04
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.