Literature DB >> 16783612

Varying levels of family history of breast cancer in relation to mammographic breast density (United States).

Anthony B Crest1, Erin J Aiello, Melissa L Anderson, Diana S M Buist.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We examined the relationship between breast cancer family history and mammographic breast density.
METHODS: Participants included 35,019 postmenopausal women aged >or=40 years enrolled in a population-based mammography screening program. We collected data on the number and type of 1st and 2nd degree female relatives with a history of breast cancer and their ages at diagnosis. We used the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System breast density categories to identify women with fatty (1 = almost entirely fatty or 2 = scattered fibroglandular tissue) and dense (3 = heterogeneously dense or 4 = extremely dense) breasts. We used logistic regression to calculate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals for dense (N = 18,111) compared to fatty breasts (N = 16,908).
RESULTS: The odds of having dense breasts were 17% greater for women with affected 1st degree relatives than women with no family history. The odds increased with more affected 1st degree relatives [>or=3 vs. none (OR = 1.46; 1.05-2.01)] and among women with >or=1 affected 1st degree relative diagnosed <50 years (OR = 1.22; 1.10-1.34).
CONCLUSIONS: Having a family history of breast cancer was more strongly associated with mammographic breast density when the affected relatives were more genetically similar. There may be common, yet undiscovered, genetic elements that affect breast cancer and mammographic breast density.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16783612     DOI: 10.1007/s10552-006-0026-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Causes Control        ISSN: 0957-5243            Impact factor:   2.506


  15 in total

1.  Risk Factors That Increase Risk of Estrogen Receptor-Positive and -Negative Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Karla Kerlikowske; Charlotte C Gard; Jeffrey A Tice; Elad Ziv; Steven R Cummings; Diana L Miglioretti
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2016-12-31       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Distribution of mammographic density and its influential factors among Chinese women.

Authors:  Hongji Dai; Ye Yan; Peishan Wang; Peifang Liu; Yali Cao; Li Xiong; Yahong Luo; Tie Pan; Xiangjun Ma; Jie Wang; Zhenhua Yang; Xueou Liu; Chuan Chen; Yubei Huang; Yi Li; Yaogang Wang; Xishan Hao; Zhaoxiang Ye; Kexin Chen
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2014-03-16       Impact factor: 7.196

3.  Family History of Breast Cancer, Breast Density, and Breast Cancer Risk in a U.S. Breast Cancer Screening Population.

Authors:  Thomas P Ahern; Brian L Sprague; Michael C S Bissell; Diana L Miglioretti; Diana S M Buist; Dejana Braithwaite; Karla Kerlikowske
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 4.254

4.  Family History and Breast Cancer Risk Among Older Women in the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium Cohort.

Authors:  Dejana Braithwaite; Diana L Miglioretti; Weiwei Zhu; Joshua Demb; Amy Trentham-Dietz; Brian Sprague; Jeffrey A Tice; Tracy Onega; Louise M Henderson; Diana S M Buist; Elad Ziv; Louise C Walter; Karla Kerlikowske
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 21.873

5.  Mammographic density does not differ between unaffected BRCA1/2 mutation carriers and women at low-to-average risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  Gretchen L Gierach; Jennifer T Loud; Catherine K Chow; Sheila A Prindiville; Jennifer Eng-Wong; Peter W Soballe; Claudia Giambartolomei; Phuong L Mai; Claudia E Galbo; Kathryn Nichols; Kathleen A Calzone; Celine Vachon; Mitchell H Gail; Mark H Greene
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  Mammographic density and breast cancer risk by family history in women of white and Asian ancestry.

Authors:  Gertraud Maskarinec; Kaylae L Nakamura; Christy G Woolcott; Shannon M Conroy; Celia Byrne; Chisato Nagata; Giske Ursin; Celine M Vachon
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 2.506

7.  Population-based estimates of the relation between breast cancer risk, tumor subtype, and family history.

Authors:  Megan L Welsh; Diana S M Buist; Erin J Aiello Bowles; Melissa L Anderson; Joann G Elmore; Christopher I Li
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2008-04-25       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 8.  Can genes for mammographic density inform cancer aetiology?

Authors:  Linda E Kelemen; Thomas A Sellers; Celine M Vachon
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2008-09-05       Impact factor: 60.716

9.  A comparison of breast density measures between mothers and adolescent daughters.

Authors:  Gertraud Maskarinec; Yukiko Morimoto; Yihe Daida; John Shepherd; Rachel Novotny
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2011-08-02       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Mammographic density and breast cancer: a comparison of related and unrelated controls in the Breast Cancer Family Registry.

Authors:  Linda Linton; Lisa J Martin; Qing Li; Ella Huszti; Salomon Minkin; Esther M John; Johanna Rommens; Andrew D Paterson; Norman F Boyd
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2013-05-25       Impact factor: 6.466

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.