Literature DB >> 16782674

Women's satisfaction with their mammography experience: results of a qualitative study.

Kimberly K Engelman1, Amy M Cizik, Edward F Ellerbeck.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Many steps in getting a mammogram may produce a less than satisfactory experience. Dissatisfaction with mammography could lead to lower routine mammography adherence. The purpose of this study was to use qualitative research methods to assess patient satisfaction with all stages of the mammography experience.
METHODS: Eleven focus groups were conducted with 103 women in rural (N=6) and urban (N=5) communities. Separate groups were held for African-American, non-Hispanic White, and Hispanic women. Participants spoke English, were 40 years of age or older, had a mammogram within the past three years, and had no history of cancer. Transcripts were analyzed for major themes related to mammography satisfaction.
RESULTS: Participants described 39 variables that affected their mammography satisfaction that may be categorized into seven primary themes: (1) appointment scheduling, (2) facility, (3) general exam, (4) embarrassment, (5) exam discomfort/pain, (6) treatment by the technologist, and (7) reporting results. The most common issues voiced were convenience and ease of scheduling appointments and follow-up tests, waiting room time and comfort, treatment by technologists, pain, and results reporting procedure and timing.
CONCLUSIONS: Satisfaction was not limited to the mammography procedure itself, but encompassed the entire experience from appointment scheduling to receipt of results and arranging follow-up. These findings indicated a variety of areas that mammography facilities might address to enhance mammography satisfaction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16782674     DOI: 10.1300/j013v42n04_02

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Women Health        ISSN: 0363-0242


  11 in total

1.  Identifying Sociocultural Barriers to Mammography Adherence Among Appalachian Kentucky Women.

Authors:  Elisia L Cohen; Bethney R Wilson; Robin C Vanderpool; Tom Collins
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2015-02-10

2.  The influence of mammographic technologists on radiologists' ability to interpret screening mammograms in community practice.

Authors:  Louise M Henderson; Thad Benefield; Mary W Marsh; Bruce F Schroeder; Danielle D Durham; Bonnie C Yankaskas; J Michael Bowling
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2014-11-27       Impact factor: 3.173

3.  Mammography Screening: Gaps in Patient's and Physician's Needs for Shared Decision-Making.

Authors:  Lori L DuBenske; Sarina Schrager; Helene McDowell; Lee G Wilke; Amy Trentham-Dietz; Elizabeth S Burnside
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 2.431

4.  Assessment of mammography experiences and satisfaction among American Indian/Alaska Native women.

Authors:  Florence M Ndikum-Moffor; Stacy Braiuca; Christine Makosky Daley; Byron J Gajewski; Kimberly K Engelman
Journal:  Womens Health Issues       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec

5.  An assessment of American Indian women's mammography experiences.

Authors:  Kimberly K Engelman; Christine M Daley; Byron J Gajewski; Florence Ndikum-Moffor; Babalola Faseru; Stacy Braiuca; Stephanie Joseph; Edward F Ellerbeck; K Allen Greiner
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2010-12-15       Impact factor: 2.809

6.  A Peer Health Educator Program for Breast Cancer Screening Promotion: Arabic, Chinese, South Asian, and Vietnamese Immigrant Women's Perspectives.

Authors:  Joanne Crawford; Angela Frisina; Tricia Hack; Faye Parascandalo
Journal:  Nurs Res Pract       Date:  2015-02-24

7.  Client and practitioner perspectives on the screening mammography experience.

Authors:  P Whelehan; A Evans; G Ozakinci
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 2.520

8.  Women's responses to information about overdiagnosis in the UK breast cancer screening programme: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Jo Waller; Elaine Douglas; Katriina L Whitaker; Jane Wardle
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2013-04-22       Impact factor: 2.692

9.  A randomised trial of weekend and evening breast screening appointments.

Authors:  J Offman; M Wilson; M Lamont; H Birke; E Kutt; S Marriage; Y Loughrey; S Hudson; A Hartley; J Smith; B Eckersley; F Dungey; D Parmar; J Patnick; S W Duffy
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-07-18       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Patient comfort from the technologist perspective: factors to consider in mammographic imaging.

Authors:  Christina C Mendat; Dave Mislan; Lisa Hession-Kunz
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2017-05-18
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.