Literature DB >> 16781399

Reconstruction of severe acetabular bone-deficiency: the Burch-Schneider antiprotrusio cage in primary and revision total hip arthroplasty.

Herwig Pieringer1, Vinzenz Auersperg, Nikolaus Böhler.   

Abstract

Ninety Burch-Schneider antiprotrusio cages in 87 patients implanted in primary and revision total hip arthroplasty were analyzed. Sixty-seven hips (64 patients) could be examined clinically and radiologically after an average of 50.3 months (minimum 23.6, maximum 131.0 months). Twenty patients (20 hips) died in interim and 3 patients (3 hips) were not available for follow-up. Of the 90 Burch-Schneider antiprotrusio cages, 4 had to be removed and 8 further cages were considered definitely loose. The survival rate is 93.4% (95% confidence interval, 74.3%-96.7%) after 131 months if the endpoint "cage explantation" is used. The average Harris Hip Score was improved from 28.2 preoperatively to 73.5 points at the time of follow-up. Radiolucent lines were often found in the Charnley/DeLee's zones II and III. In contrast, osteolyses were seldom seen.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16781399     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2005.02.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  18 in total

1.  Large acetabular defects can be managed with cementless revision components.

Authors:  E Scott Paxton; James A Keeney; William J Maloney; John C Clohisy
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Acetabular cage survival and analysis of factors related to failure.

Authors:  Jonathan N Sembrano; Edward Y Cheng
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-02-26       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Why revision total hip arthroplasty fails.

Authors:  Bryan D Springer; Thomas K Fehring; William L Griffin; Susan M Odum; John L Masonis
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2008-10-31       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Late fracture of a Burch-Schneider acetabular cage: rare occurrence following polyethylene cup wear.

Authors:  Dario Regis; Andrea Sandri; Alessandra Rizzo; Pietro Bartolozzi
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2009-03-26

Review 5.  The evolution of outcomes and indications for the dual-mobility cup: a systematic review.

Authors:  Cécile Batailler; Camdon Fary; Régis Verdier; Thierry Aslanian; Jacques Caton; Sebastien Lustig
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-12-21       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 6.  Clinical evaluation and surgical options in acetabular reconstruction: A literature review.

Authors:  Asim Qamar Ahmad; Ran Schwarzkopf
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2015-11-02

7.  Custom Acetabular Cages Offer Stable Fixation and Improved Hip Scores for Revision THA With Severe Bone Defects.

Authors:  Huiwu Li; Xinhua Qu; Yuanqing Mao; Kerong Dai; Zhenan Zhu
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2015-10-14       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Two-stage treatment of acetabular bone defect in tuberculosis of the hip by intended ankylosis followed by total hip arthroplasty: a case report.

Authors:  Els E Vogelpoel; Jurjen J Been; Arthur A de Gast
Journal:  Cases J       Date:  2009-03-25

9.  Tritanium acetabular wedge augments: short-term results.

Authors:  Camilo Restrepo; Snir Heller; Antonia F Chen
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2016-06

10.  Revision total hip arthroplasty with a Kerboull plate: comparative outcomes using standard versus dual mobility cups.

Authors:  Chahine Assi; Jacques Caton; Wissam Fawaz; Camille Samaha; Kaissar Yammine
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.