Literature DB >> 16781398

Total hip arthroplasty: is small incision better?

Michael Ciminiello1, Javad Parvizi, Peter F Sharkey, Aidin Eslampour, Richard H Rothman.   

Abstract

Outcome data are eagerly awaited at present time to evaluate the role of minimally invasive surgery in orthopedic surgery. This matched-pair study reports the outcome of total hip arthroplasty (THA) performed through regular or small incision technique by a single surgeon. There were 120 patients in this cohort with a mean age of 66.8 years (range, 39-90 years). There was no detectable difference in outcome between the two groups with regard to blood loss, analgesia requirement, functional recovery, length of hospital stay, or disposition at discharge. One patient in the small incision group with undersized femoral component required revision of the femoral stem 8 months later. The recent extensive interest for minimally invasive THA has been attributed to market-driven and patient-driven demand for this procedure. We were not able to detect any difference in outcome parameters for THA performed through small incision compared with the conventional techniques.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16781398     DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2005.09.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Arthroplasty        ISSN: 0883-5403            Impact factor:   4.757


  6 in total

1.  Injury to the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve during minimally invasive hip surgery: a cadaver study.

Authors:  Simon S Jameson; Daniel W J Howcroft; Andrew W McCaskie; Craig H Gerrand
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.891

2.  [Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty - trend or state of the art?: A meta-analysis].

Authors:  T Kappe; R Bieger; D Wernerus; H Reichel
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 3.  Minimally invasive and computer-navigated total hip arthroplasty: a qualitative and systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Inge H F Reininga; Wiebren Zijlstra; Robert Wagenmakers; Alexander L Boerboom; Bregtje P Huijbers; Johan W Groothoff; Sjoerd K Bulstra; Martin Stevens
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-05-17       Impact factor: 2.362

Review 4.  Computed tomography for preoperative planning in total hip arthroplasty: what radiologists need to know.

Authors:  Alexander Huppertz; Sebastian Radmer; Moritz Wagner; Torsten Roessler; Bernd Hamm; Martin Sparmann
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Length of stay following primary total hip replacement.

Authors:  Julian Foote; Kirby Panchoo; Peter Blair; Gordon Bannister
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2009-06-25       Impact factor: 1.891

6.  Relevance of infiltration analgesia in pain relief after total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Justyna Znojek-Tymborowska; Rafał Kęska; Przemysław T Paradowski; Dariusz Witoński
Journal:  Acta Ortop Bras       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 0.513

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.