Literature DB >> 16781220

The influence of risk status on guideline adherence for patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes.

Matthew T Roe1, Eric D Peterson, L Kristin Newby, Anita Y Chen, Charles V Pollack, Ralph G Brindis, Robert A Harrington, Robert H Christenson, Sidney C Smith, Robert M Califf, Eugene Braunwald, W Brian Gibler, E Magnus Ohman.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Practice guidelines for patients with non-ST-segment elevation (NSTE) acute coronary syndromes (ACS) recommend targeting evidence-based therapies for the highest-risk patients. We characterized guideline adherence for NSTE ACS by risk status.
METHODS: We analyzed inhospital treatments and outcomes for 77760 patients with NSTE ACS (ischemic ST-segment changes and/or positive cardiac markers) included in the CRUSADE initiative from January 2001 to September 2003 at 457 US hospitals. Compliance with the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Class guideline recommendations for NSTE ACS was evaluated in subgroups of eligible patients without listed contraindications at increased risk for mortality and among risk categories designated by an adapted version of the PURSUIT risk model designed to predict inhospital mortality.
RESULTS: Inhospital mortality was increased in patients with diabetes mellitus (5.8% vs 4.3%), renal insufficiency (10.0% vs 3.9%), signs of congestive heart failure on presentation (10.6% vs 3.1%), and age > or = 75 years (8.6% vs 2.7%), compared with patients without these features. Use of guideline-recommended acute medications, invasive cardiac procedures, and discharge medications and interventions was significantly lower in patients with these high-risk features. Patients designated as high-risk for inhospital mortality were less likely to be treated with guideline-recommended therapies compared with low-risk and moderate-risk patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with NSTE ACS with the highest risk of mortality are less likely to receive guideline-recommended therapies and interventions. These findings highlight the need to clarify guideline recommendations for high-risk patients and to develop novel quality improvement approaches that target undertreated subgroups of patients with NSTE ACS.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16781220     DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2005.08.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Heart J        ISSN: 0002-8703            Impact factor:   4.749


  29 in total

1.  [Characteristics of therapy of acute myocardial infarction in diabetes].

Authors:  W Motz; W Kerner
Journal:  Herz       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 1.443

2.  Temporal trends in the use of invasive cardiac procedures for non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndromes according to initial risk stratification.

Authors:  S Jedrzkiewicz; S G Goodman; R T Yan; R C Welsh; J Kornder; J Paul DeYoung; G C Wong; B Rose; F R Grondin; R Gallo; W Huang; J M Gore; A T Yan
Journal:  Can J Cardiol       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 5.223

Review 3.  Non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes: targeted imaging to refine upstream risk stratification.

Authors:  Henry Chang; James K Min; Sunil V Rao; Manesh R Patel; Orlando P Simonetti; Giuseppe Ambrosio; Subha V Raman
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 7.792

4.  Gap between clinical guidelines and practice: the case of aldosterone-antagonists in patients with myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Supriya Shore; Thomas M Maddox; Fengming Tang; Philip G Jones; David E Lanfear; P Michael Ho
Journal:  Int J Cardiol       Date:  2013-12-28       Impact factor: 4.164

5.  Longitudinal persistence with secondary prevention therapies relative to patient risk after myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Supriya Shore; Philip G Jones; Thomas M Maddox; Steven M Bradley; Joshua M Stolker; Suzanne V Arnold; Susmita Parashar; Pamela Peterson; Deepak L Bhatt; John Spertus; P Michael Ho
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2015-03-23       Impact factor: 5.994

6.  Patterns of stress testing and diagnostic catheterization after coronary stenting in 250 350 medicare beneficiaries.

Authors:  Daniel W Mudrick; Bimal R Shah; Lisa A McCoy; Barbara L Lytle; Frederick A Masoudi; Jerome J Federspiel; Patricia A Cowper; Cynthia Green; Pamela S Douglas
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2012-10-16       Impact factor: 7.792

7.  Lessons learned from the CRUSADE National Quality Improvement Initiative.

Authors:  Eric D Peterson; David Z Bynum; Matthew T Roe
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 2.931

8.  Hospital performance and differences by kidney function in the use of recommended therapies after non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes.

Authors:  Uptal D Patel; Fang-Shu Ou; E Magnus Ohman; W Brian Gibler; Charles V Pollack; Eric D Peterson; Matthew T Roe
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2008-12-19       Impact factor: 8.860

Review 9.  Risk stratification and timing of revascularization: which patients benefit from early versus later revascularization?

Authors:  Ian J Sarembock; Dean J Kereiakes
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 2.931

10.  Compliance of pharmacological treatment for non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes with contemporary guidelines: influence on outcomes.

Authors:  Hélder Dores; Carlos Aguiar; Jorge Ferreira; Jorge Mimoso; Sílvia Monteiro; Filipe Seixo; José Ferreira Santos
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2014-02
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.