BACKGROUND: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with an increased risk of cardiac events and death; however, underuse of guideline-recommended therapies is widespread. The extent to which hospital performance affects the care of patients with CKD and non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE ACSs) is unknown. STUDY DESIGN: Observational cohort. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: 81,374 patients with NSTE ACSs treated at 327 US hospitals. PREDICTOR: Hospital performance, measured by quartiles of composite adherence to American Heart Association class I guidelines for therapy acutely (aspirin, beta-blockers, clopidogrel, heparin, and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors) and at discharge (aspirin, clopidogrel, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, and lipid-lowering agents) in eligible patients. OUTCOMES & MEASUREMENTS: Use of each American Heart Association class I acute and discharge therapy stratified by continuous estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Multivariable models were adjusted for demographics, clinical factors, and hospital features. RESULTS: Better-performing hospitals had lower prescribing rates for most therapies (5 of 9) with lower levels of kidney function, whereas lower-performing hospitals were more likely to have similar prescribing rates across the eGFR spectrum, suggesting that prescribing patterns at these hospitals were insensitive to differences in eGFR. LIMITATIONS: Observational design, selection bias of study cohort. CONCLUSION: Patients with lower levels of kidney function admitted with NSTE ACSs are less likely to receive evidence-based therapies. Treatment disparities related to CKD are most evident at top-performing hospitals.
BACKGROUND:Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with an increased risk of cardiac events and death; however, underuse of guideline-recommended therapies is widespread. The extent to which hospital performance affects the care of patients with CKD and non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE ACSs) is unknown. STUDY DESIGN: Observational cohort. SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: 81,374 patients with NSTE ACSs treated at 327 US hospitals. PREDICTOR: Hospital performance, measured by quartiles of composite adherence to American Heart Association class I guidelines for therapy acutely (aspirin, beta-blockers, clopidogrel, heparin, and glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors) and at discharge (aspirin, clopidogrel, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, and lipid-lowering agents) in eligible patients. OUTCOMES & MEASUREMENTS: Use of each American Heart Association class I acute and discharge therapy stratified by continuous estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Multivariable models were adjusted for demographics, clinical factors, and hospital features. RESULTS: Better-performing hospitals had lower prescribing rates for most therapies (5 of 9) with lower levels of kidney function, whereas lower-performing hospitals were more likely to have similar prescribing rates across the eGFR spectrum, suggesting that prescribing patterns at these hospitals were insensitive to differences in eGFR. LIMITATIONS: Observational design, selection bias of study cohort. CONCLUSION:Patients with lower levels of kidney function admitted with NSTE ACSs are less likely to receive evidence-based therapies. Treatment disparities related to CKD are most evident at top-performing hospitals.
Authors: Rajendra H Mehta; Cecelia K Montoye; Meg Gallogly; Patricia Baker; Angela Blount; Jessica Faul; Canopy Roychoudhury; Steven Borzak; Susan Fox; Mary Franklin; Marge Freundl; Eva Kline-Rogers; Thomas LaLonde; Michele Orza; Robert Parrish; Martha Satwicz; Mary Jo Smith; Paul Sobotka; Stuart Winston; Arthur A Riba; Kim A Eagle Journal: JAMA Date: 2002-03-13 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Eugene Braunwald; Elliott M Antman; John W Beasley; Robert M Califf; Melvin D Cheitlin; Judith S Hochman; Robert H Jones; Dean Kereiakes; Joel Kupersmith; Thomas N Levin; Carl J Pepine; John W Schaeffer; Earl E Smith; David E Steward; Pierre Theroux; Raymond J Gibbons; Joseph S Alpert; David P Faxon; Valentin Fuster; Gabriel Gregoratos; Loren F Hiratzka; Alice K Jacobs; Sidney C Smith Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2002-10-02 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: A T Hirsch; M H Criqui; D Treat-Jacobson; J G Regensteiner; M A Creager; J W Olin; S H Krook; D B Hunninghake; A J Comerota; M E Walsh; M M McDermott; W R Hiatt Journal: JAMA Date: 2001-09-19 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Peter A McCullough; Keisha R Sandberg; Steven Borzak; Michael P Hudson; Mukesh Garg; Harold J Manley Journal: Am Heart J Date: 2002-08 Impact factor: 4.749
Authors: R Scott Wright; Guy S Reeder; Charles A Herzog; Robert C Albright; Brent A Williams; David L Dvorak; Wayne L Miller; Joseph G Murphy; Stephen L Kopecky; Allan S Jaffe Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2002-10-01 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Michael G Shlipak; Paul A Heidenreich; Haruko Noguchi; Glenn M Chertow; Warren S Browner; Mark B McClellan Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2002-10-01 Impact factor: 25.391
Authors: Nisha Bansal; Chi-yuan Hsu; Malini Chandra; Carlos Iribarren; Stephen P Fortmann; Mark A Hlatky; Alan S Go Journal: BMC Nephrol Date: 2011-09-14 Impact factor: 2.388
Authors: Bruce Ovbiagele; Lee H Schwamm; Eric E Smith; Maria V Grau-Sepulveda; Jeffrey L Saver; Deepak L Bhatt; Adrian F Hernandez; Eric D Peterson; Gregg C Fonarow Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2014-06-05 Impact factor: 5.501